Well, it seems this element has a long tradition of being
ignored by the
stylesheets. 8^)
The citebiblioid element was added in DocBook 4.2, which is
about 5 years
old. As far as I can tell, it has never been handled by the
XSL
stylesheets. I can't find any bug reports that include that
element name
in the summary line on SourceForge either. I'm mystified
that no one
noticed before.
Could someone please file a bug report on SourceForge to get
this included?
Thanks.
Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
DocBook Consulting
bobs sagehill.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kilian" <winkelklammern texttheater.de>
To: "Thomas Schraitle" <tom_schr web.de>
Cc: <docbook-apps lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] ...but no template matches.
>> You wrote you don't use a customization layer so I
suppose it has
>> something to do with a missing namespace or the
like. Do you use
>> XIncludes?
>
> No, I don't.
>
> I grepped all of the stylesheets - the string
"citebibloid" does not
> occur at all. Is it possible that not all of the
DocBook 5.0 elements are
> supported yet by DocBook XSL?
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help lists.oasis-open.org
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help lists.oasis-open.org
|