On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 12:20:20PM EST, Daniel Leidert
wrote:
[snip]
>
> This looks like http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=291813
a>
> and http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=318822.
>
> I didn't fully examine the problem yet, but it seems to
be caused by
> passivetex [1], which has been removed from Debian
Etch/Sid.
That is really good news, not only does it "not
work" but it also takes
a heck of a long time doing so.
> As mentioned in the mail cited in the footnote,
dblatex(.sf.net) might
> be a replacement for passivetex. But it seems, you are
a Sarge user.
> I'm not sure, what I should suggest. docbook-xsl(you
can safely use
> the package from Sid under Sarge) and fop should work
for creating
> PDFs. But I don't know, how this fits your LaTeX
environment.
> [1] See also http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
291813;msg=12.
Thanks.
I would pretty much like to keep the xml/docbook & LaTeX
environments
seperate.
The kernel on my debian etch system needs a bit of work but
I should be
able to bring it up some time next weekend and if I can get
FOP to work
on this new system, I'll be a happy camper.
Thanks,
cga
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-unsubscribe lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-help lists.oasis-open.org
|