jmt wrote:
> Nevertheless, I'm a bit disappointed to realize that,
for instance :
>
> <para><inlineequation>MathML
stuff</inlineequation></para>
>
> is NOT valid Docbook5 ; effectively the only elements
in Docbook 5 that
> natively support mathml elements are equation and
informalequation.
>
> I've tried, but for now on, with no success, to modify
the docbook rnc to be
> able to write such things.
> Any pointers on this subject will be welcome !
Moving to docbook list as this is markup issue.
Lack of MathML support inside inlineequation is probably
bug. However,
you can easily fix it by creating simple schema
customization:
include "docbook.rnc"
db.inlineequation.content |= db._any.mml+
--
------------------------------------------------------------
------
Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------
------
Professional XML consulting and training services
DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document
processing
------------------------------------------------------------
------
OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34
member
------------------------------------------------------------
------
|