Re: keycap vs keysym

Markus Hoenicka wrote:
> Quoting Markus Hoenicka <markus.hoenickamhoenicka.de>:
> 
>>
<keycombo><keycap>Alt</keycap><keycap&g
t;x</keycap></keycombo><keycap>revert-buff
er</keycap> 
>>
>>
> 
> This should of course have been:
> 
>
<keycombo><keycap>Alt</keycap><keycap&g
t;x</keycap></keycombo><userinput>revert-b
uffer</userinput> 

Yes, that's what my first thought was Markus.
User input could cover a command, a function or any other
combination.

keycombo (keycap* | keysym* | userinput)+  would be good for
this.

Or even CDATA as part of the model,

<keycombo><keycap>Alt</keycap><keycap&g
t;x</keycap><userinput>revert-buffer</userinp
ut></keycombo>

would make this better IMHO.

regards


-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT, XSL-FO and Docbook FAQ
http://www.dpawson.co.uk



------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-unsubscribelists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-helplists.oasis-open.org