|
List Info Thread: Re4: Some Patches ("?>", PHP4,
[1]
|
||||||||||||
|
about | contact Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics ) |
||||||||||||
Re4: Some Patches ("?>", PHP4, |
|
List Info Thread: Re4: Some Patches ("?>", PHP4,
[1]
|
||||||||||||
|
about | contact Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics ) |
||||||||||||
> > (you need maybe a playground button on your
template.)
>
> The hide option will hide the page from search results
and the RSS feed.
> Links to the page will work just fine and the page is
accessible as every
> other page. So this is effectively the option you are
trying to reinvent.
>
> Please take the time to check how features work when
suggested to you,
> instead of assuming how they might work.
I now this.
If i oversee some functions, sorry for this, my experiences
are based on the last official release, and if i down't see
a change on the place of the patch, cold by that i oversee a
effect on a other place in the code witch clean the effect
as well i try to patch.
I test this patch (RSS exclusion) with the newest version,
and i am sorry, but i can agree with your arguments. no read
permission **not** exclude the rss of the site, in dw
version 2008-03-11.
It is hidden in the index, if you use a sitebar with the
index as navigator, the playground is hidden and you have to
place a extra link somewhere (i now, you down't use a
sitebar, but some do)
In my opinion, hide something from index/search and
something from rss is not the same and should by managed
separately.
All arguments are proofed as best i can, otherwise i will
not waste my time to make patches, this is not my regular
work. (speaking from css rss linebreak patches now.)
----
i interrupt this discussion now here, and i explain you
why.
There are two extremes witch work like poison.
One extreme is feature addicted. This cores a todo list
longer than the bible, a complex code witch nobody is able
to understand anymore, and a code witch is more faulty and
faulty and never finished.
The other extreme is fear and resistance of changing
anything or take any change as a criticism to the project,
this cores discussions of 300 flip-flops for any little code
line, denying anyway everything is the result, and all was
nothing then a time waste and frustrating.
The difficulty is to find the balance in between.
Everybody can do in his environment what ever he
want , i can patch what ever i want, demolish what ever i
want, and put the must ugliest and stupid design you can
find in the internet if i want. And you can do what ever you
want. I try to share what was good for my, but i respect,
this is your project.
So i set for me a limit of 3 - 5 flip-flop discussions for
such little changes. Every patch is only a few lines of code
with maybe a big good effect and have no complexification
sideeffect. I have and will patch this, and i try to
subscribe why, as good as possible in bad english. If you
down't agree with me, cool, no problem, go your way and be
happy, and i will do the same. I down't fight for reasons
and territory.
All arguments are proofed as best i can, otherwise i will
not waste my time to make patches, this is not my regular
work. (speaking from css rss linebreak patches now
specially)
So pleas understand if i interrupt the discussion here. 
(if you
have something important or a "killer" argument, i
still respond.)
If i am now explaining my behaving, a second thing. I detect
that sarcasm and then specially the expectation of sarcasm
cause a lot of friction and misunderstanding, and permanent
preparedness of self defense (of course, beside of arrogance
bigmouthness sociopathie egoism arrogance nazism mobbing
psychopathie and arrogance et et et. Look to wikipedia, step
by step all good people run frustrated away and only
egosentrixx remain