Note: I changed the topic so I don't derail the distro
thread with this
Moshe said:
> It is sad to see this discussion side-tracked. The
purpose of this
> discussion is NOT to debate why packagers exist (that
is not what Seemant
> asked for), but to figure out how we can better
cooperate. The world
> doesn't care about your opinion about packagers;
whatever it is you think
> about them, they are not going to go away. So if
you're not going to
> help make Drupal better for packagers, don't add noise
to the discussion
> either. It would be a waste of time and bits.
Thanks.
Michelle said:
> This isn't a sidetrack; it's an important point. If
the current
project descriptions will be overwritten by the .info files,
then
there's no
> point spending time now cleaning up the text itself.
There's still
tagging needing to be done, but I don't want to be changing
the ?
> project description if it's all getting wiped out
soon.
Jonathan said:
>It's a good point, but it really is sidetracked from the
original request.
>Also, you're directly ignoring Dries' polite request not
to add noise to
>the discussion (I'm not singling you out personally).
This point should
>be a separate thread.
Excuse me? I did no such thing. This email you are quoting
is from my
"Documenting contribs" thread and has nothing to
do with the linux distros.
I certainly hope you're not suggesting the dev list be
confined to one
discussion thread at a time. I seriously doubt that's what
Dries had in mind
with his request.
Michelle
|