OP MAANDAG 12 NOVEMBER 2007, SCHREEF LARRY GARFIELD:
>THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE I SEE IS TO USE
DATA-STRUCTURE-BASED QUERY BUILDERS
INSTEAD IN SOME CASES.
> WHILE I AGREE THAT FORCING US TO THINK ABOUT MULTIPLE
DATABASES IS GOOD
> ARCHITECTURALLY, WE JUST DON'T HAVE THE RESOURCES TO
SUPPORT NON-MYSQL AS
> WELL AS WE DO POSTGRESQL. I WOULD NOT OBJECT TO
COMMITTING THE MYSQL
> PORTIONS AND FIXING POSTGRESQL LATER.
THIS WHOLE THREAD IS THE MAIN REASON WHY MANY PROJECTS
CHOOSE TO BUILD A
REALLY DB INDEPENDENT SYSTEM. LIKE ADODB OR ACTIVE RECORD.
THOSE TWO, IMO ARE
OTT FOR DRUPAL, BUT STILL, ITS WORTH NOTING IT DOWN
SOMEWHERE: "NOV 2007: BIG
ISSUES, LONG THREADS, FRUSTRATED DEVELOPERS, DELAYED
RELEASE: CAUSED BY OUR
DB-BSTRACTION, NOT BEING REALLY ABSTRACT ENOUGH".
BčR
--
DRUPAL, RUBY ON RAILS AND JOOMLA! DEVELOPMENT
HTTP://WEBSCHUUR.COM
|