Wow amazing work I'll have
to re-evaluate it then, thanks!
Wim
Jeff Eaton wrote:
> Actually, I believe the current version does. Webchick
added it for a
> site we were working on, and .. voila!
>
>
>
> On Dec 30, 2007, at 10:46 AM, Wim Mostrey wrote:
>
>> I don't think bio is a good candidate for this, if
the plan is to
>> replace the profile module. Bio does not allow to
put fields in the user
>> registration form, which in my opinion is a
required functionality for
>> core. From my experience node profile does the
cleanest of this (to make
>> it core-worthy the node family dependency would
need to be dropped of
>> course).
>
|