Re: Module developers, please do *proper* releases !

On Monday, 18. February 2008, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
> [snip]
> I think it is in the right of drupal infrastructure
team to impose
> minimum requirement so that your module is hosted and
advertised on
> drupal infrastructure and associated with drupal
project.

Definitely. Note that I don't argue against enforcing
releases on drupal.org 
when that's considered a good thing by the infrastructure
people.
(Personally, I try to release often enough so that *-dev
releases shouldn't be 
required at all.)

I was just speaking out against the statement that open
source always implies 
responsibilities towards the user base. It sometimes does,
and drupal.org can 
enforce rules that makes life nicer for the user base, but
in general this 
statement does not apply, imho.

That's what I wanted to express, nothing more.

On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:23:56 +0100
Jakob Petsovits <jpetsogmx.at> wrote:

> I was just speaking out against the statement that open
source
> always implies responsibilities towards the user base.
It sometimes
> does, and drupal.org can enforce rules that makes life
nicer for
> the user base, but in general this statement does not
apply, imho.

> That's what I wanted to express, nothing more.

I think Free Software just imply *different*
responsibilities...
towards your co-developers for example.

-- 
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
http://www.webthatworks.it