Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo

Glenn Morris wrote:
> Richard Stallman wrote:
> 
>>     work out.  The best that a program could do in
this regard is set
>>     buffer-undo-list to t before doing its changes,
and to nil afterwards.
>>
>> That sounds like a good solution -- better than
suppressing undo 100%
>> in that buffer.
> 
> Can we just leave this alone for Emacs 22? There is no
actual problem
> we are trying to fix, other than the general sentiment
that changes
> produced by display-warning should not be undoable. I
don't see any
> harm in the current behaviour, and there seems to be no
good, simple
> solution.

It is not a big problem, but perhaps it would then be best
to just 
disable undo in the *Warnings* buffer?


_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-develgnu.org
htt
p://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

    > Can we just leave this alone for Emacs 22? There is
no actual problem
    > we are trying to fix, other than the general
sentiment that changes
    > produced by display-warning should not be undoable.
I don't see any
    > harm in the current behaviour, and there seems to
be no good, simple
    > solution.

    It is not a big problem, but perhaps it would then be
best to just 
    disable undo in the *Warnings* buffer?

I agree.


_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-develgnu.org
htt
p://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel