Ralf Angeli wrote:
> * Stefan Monnier (2008-04-23) writes:
>
>>> Another option would be to remove those
bindings altogether and put the
>>> code for defining the key bindings into the
manual for easy copying and
>>> pasting into the init file.
>> Doesn't seem like an improvement,
>
> Then I'd suggest to just add a comment in reftex.el as
proposed earlier
> in this thread.
I suggested moving this to the defcustom instead (and of
course updating
its doc string). Is not that easier for the user?
> Following is a ChangeLog entry and patch.
>
>
> 2008-04-24 Ralf Angeli <angeli caeruleus.net>
>
> * textmodes/reftex.el: Explain in a comment why
> `reftex-extra-bindings' activates key bindings
reserverd for
> users.
>
>
> --- reftex.el.~1.86.~ 2008-04-19 08:52:29.000000000
+0200
> +++ reftex.el 2008-04-24 22:19:18.000000000 +0200
> -2403,7 +2403,10
> "bibtex"
> '(define-key bibtex-mode-map "C-c&"
'reftex-view-crossref-from-bibtex))
>
> -;; If the user requests so, she can have a few more
bindings:
> +;; For most of these commands there are already
bindings in place.
> +;; Setting `reftex-extra-bindings' really is only
there to spare users
> +;; the hassle of defining bindings in the user space
themselves. This
> +;; is why they violate the key binding
recommendations.
> (when reftex-extra-bindings
> (loop for x in
> '(("C-ct" . reftex-toc)
>
>
|
