|
List Info
Thread: Re: Searchability of non-mainspace pages
|
|
| Re: Searchability of non-mainspace
pages |
  United States |
2008-04-28 13:37:31 |
In a message dated 4/28/2008 7:16:37 A.M. Pacific Daylight
Time,
cohesion sleepyhead.org writes:
Page blanking does work almost all the
time, but what about areas that have a high likelihood for
problems?
Should we not index from the start, or only blank as needed
for the
sake of transparency? I kinda like both solutions equally.
:P>>
----------------------
I'm in agreement with Judson here.
Any specific, exact, identified, particular... issues could
be solved with
oversight.
There is no need to wipe the entire board white to solve a
few
particular-case concerns.
Will Johnson
**************Need a new ride? Check out the largest site
for U.S. used car
listings at AOL Autos.
(h
ttp://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
|
|
| Re: Searchability of non-mainspace
pages |

|
2008-04-28 13:52:12 |
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:37 AM, <WJhonson aol.com> wrote:
> I'm in agreement with Judson here.
> Any specific, exact, identified, particular... issues
could be solved with
> oversight.
> There is no need to wipe the entire board white to
solve a few
> particular-case concerns.
Page blanking and oversight are generally only done AFTER
problems are
identified. Marking our non-product pages as non-indexable
reduces
the likelihood of problems in the first place - what
generally bothers
someone is not that things are written about them but that
they show
up on the first page of Google results.
-Matt
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
|
|
| Re: Searchability of non-mainspace
pages |

|
2008-04-28 14:01:37 |
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Matthew Brown
<morven gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:37 AM, <WJhonson aol.com> wrote:
> > I'm in agreement with Judson here.
> > Any specific, exact, identified, particular...
issues could be solved
> with
> > oversight.
> > There is no need to wipe the entire board white
to solve a few
> > particular-case concerns.
>
> Page blanking and oversight are generally only done
AFTER problems are
> identified. Marking our non-product pages as
non-indexable reduces
> the likelihood of problems in the first place - what
generally bothers
> someone is not that things are written about them but
that they show
> up on the first page of Google results.
>
> -Matt
>
We are normally able to figure out when something is
particularly
embarrassing. I, at least, have no hesitation in erring on
the side of
caution by blanking discussions if I think them problematic
- before there
are any complaints. I still don't see the problem - perhaps
it could be done
more often.
RR
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
|
|
| Re: Searchability of non-mainspace
pages |

|
2008-04-28 17:06:00 |
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Relata Refero
<refero.relata gmail.com> wrote:
> We are normally able to figure out when something is
particularly
> embarrassing. I, at least, have no hesitation in
erring on the side of
> caution by blanking discussions if I think them
problematic - before there
> are any complaints. I still don't see the problem -
perhaps it could be done
> more often.
>
Yes, I meant, I came into this liking the no-index magic
word
scenario, but Relata may have a point. Maybe blanking is
good enough.
In my experience people are happy with it, and I mean very
simple
blanking, not even deletion, much less oversight. What they
don't want
is to be a hit in Google, they usually don't care one bit
about our
history.
I usually feel like for every n people that complain, a
multiple of n
stay silent, despite being wronged. That's why I would lean
towards
preemptive no-indexing for *some* pages. (AFD etc), but this
is a
slippery slope. The idea of blanking easily as the only
solution is
appealing also.
Judson
http://en.
wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cohesion
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
|
|
[1-4]
|
|
|
about | contact Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )
|