Re: Upper right messages

Incidently, I went through the past few months data from 
http://donate.
wikimedia.org/en/node/22

dec 712 000
Jan 120 000
fev 23 000
mars 36 000
april 19 000

Indeed, it will be interesting to see if switching on the
banner again 
make a difference or not.

Ant


Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Andrew Gray
<andrew.graydunelm.org.uk> wrote:
>>  >> Any non-logged-in user now gets a
randomly selected message displayed
>>  >> in quite small text in the upper right -
"Find out more about
>>  >> navigating Wikipedia" or "Learn
how to use Wikipedia for research".
> [snip]
>>  There's *also* a donation-beg notice in the upper
left, aligned flush
>>  above the tabs, which vanishes when logged in as
well. Hmm.
>>
>>  This one just seems a lot untidier than the
begging notice. I wonder
>>  if - once we get a better fundraising flow - it
might be best to drop
>>  the begging notice and move this into its
place...
> 
> Oh how short our memory is:  Those same notices were
there for much of
> 2007 and a top of the page donation notice has been on
English
> Wikipedia for several years.
> 
> They got taken down during the fundraiser after Erik
requested it on
> 11/13/2007, a request which made a lot of sense to me.
> 
> I pinged some people about restoring the notices in
January .. but it
> was thought it would be a good idea to give a couple
weeks breathing
> room after the fundraiser... Well, it seems that no one
remembered to
> bring the beg notice back.
> 
> Last year outside of fundraisers the monthly 'run rate'
donation
> average was something around 50k/month.
> Last month there was only 19.5k donated through the
online system.
> I thought this was rather alarming and I went and rung
bells about it
> earlier in the week.
> 
> If the decline was due to the lack of the prominent
notice on EnWP
> then the foundation would have lost a rather
considerable amount due
> to this oversight (add up the difference over a couple
of months..!)
> ,... but part of the decline was probably due to
general economic
> conditions.   It's hard to say what the impact was
because the rate of
> donations has historically been pretty noisy, though I
suppose it will
> be more clear in a few weeks.  ... Although the first
couple days of
> the notice being restored show >2x the donations vs
the week before
> so.. ::shrugs::  then again just about any change in
how we're
> requesting donations causes a big short term spike.
> 
> Obviously having the best looking and least obtrusive
behavior is
> desirable, but something which generates tens of
thousands of dollars
> a month in donations is not something that should be
toyed with
> lightly. ;)   (Though feel free to send me $30k/month
if you think
> it's an unimportant sum ....  ;) )
> 
> (Beyond just measuring the income, the anon notices can
be expected to
> have other important positive results that are harder
to measure...
> like increasing public awareness that Wikipedia is run
by a charity,
> etc)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-llists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> 


_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-llists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l