Re: compiled trivial vector intrinsic code is inefficient

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 04:16:43AM +0200, Uoti Urpala
wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 02:32 +0100, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> > Anyway iam glad ffmpeg compiles fine under icc.
> 
> Except for at least two known miscompiled functions...

Yes, though i wonder how many would be miscompiled if ffmpeg
were developed
under icc and compiled for the "first" time under
gcc. I remember working
around plenty of asm()-gcc issues ...

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint:
9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Observe your enemies, for they first find out your faults.
-- Antisthenes

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-develmplayerhq.hu
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 03:36 +0100, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 04:16:43AM +0200, Uoti Urpala
wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 02:32 +0100, Michael
Niedermayer wrote:
> > > Anyway iam glad ffmpeg compiles fine under
icc.
> > 
> > Except for at least two known miscompiled
functions...
> 
> Yes, though i wonder how many would be miscompiled if
ffmpeg were developed
> under icc and compiled for the "first" time
under gcc. I remember working
> around plenty of asm()-gcc issues ...

Issues in which version of gcc? And the known icc
miscompilations are in
plain C code, how many workarounds for gcc problems with
plain C are
there?

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-develmplayerhq.hu
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel