On 05.03.2007 13:47, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 08:10:33PM +0100, Thorsten
Leemhuis wrote:
>> Rahul Sundaram schrieb:
>>> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 12:18:32 +0100
>>>> bugs.michael gmx.net (Michael Schwendt)
wrote:
>>>>> The missing obsoletes is a fundamental
problem, not specific to
>>>>> Extras. There is no automatic garbage
collection during upgrades.
>>> Do we know of any distribution that handles it
better?
>> No idea, but maybe we could ship a
"garbage-collector.7-1.fc7.rpm" in
>> the repo that simply obsoletes all packages that
aren't shipped anymore
>> and don't get obsoleted by other packages.
> And what if such a package gets picked up by another
repo?
It would need to provide a newer one (the obsoletes in the
garbage
collector rpm of course needs to be versioned).
But I'd say we shouldn't care to much about this corner case
-- getting
the old stuff away is more important IMHO. Further: it would
be best for
everyone if the maintainer of "another repo" would
simply continue to
maintain the package in Extras
CU
thl
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-
list
|