Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Since I've already got it to a working state, I may as
well submit it for
> review. If it gets reviewed and added before the
requisite ScummVM
> release, that's gravy. If not, it was still worth it
to me to package it
> for my own use.
>
Wouldn't it be better to package nagi, as that is more
complete and prefered by
qt-agibuilder if I understand things correctly, then you
also have a good
reason to ship it with Fedora, since it (nagi) then is a
development tool.
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
Fedora-games-list mailing list
Fedora-games-list redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-games-list
|
