List Info

Thread:




country flaguser name
Germany
2007-02-07 03:42:28
FYI

personally I think we have to decide what to do latest on
FOSDEM in
Brüssel ...

Regards

Gerold



PS.: Is Red Hat this year part of Linuxtag????





-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
> Von: Marko Jung|LinuxTag <mjunglinuxtag.org>
> Antwort an: projects-announcelinuxtag.org, Marko
Jung|LinuxTag
> <mjunglinuxtag.org>
> An: projects-announcelinuxtag.org
> Betreff: [LT06-Pro-Announce] Infomail #1, Februar 7,
2007
> Datum: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 10:35:44 +0100
> 
> Dear Project,
> 
> with this mailing we would like to inform you about:
>   o Call for Projects
>   o Project Workshops
> 
> 
> 1. Call for Projects
> 
> Today we start the official 'Call for Projects' to
exhibit at the
> 13th LinuxTag, May 30 - June 3, 2007 at Messegelände
unter dem Funkturm,
> Berlin, Germany. Detailed information can be found at
LinuxTag's website
> [1]. Please take a look at our terms and read the FAQ.
(An English
> translation of the FAQ will be provided soon.)
> 
> The project committee has a very hard job to decide for
some projects
> whether they will get a booth (sponsored by LinuxTag)
or we have to
> charge them for it because of its strong commercial
background. This
> decision is not easy to make and differs in each case,
but we try to
> make it fair for everybody. Therefore we have updated
the Virtual
> Conference Center [2] with some new questions
concerning your projects
> contributors and community. By providing us as much
information as
> possible, you can help us to ensure that only
non-commercial projects
> can benefit from the sponsored booths.
> 
> You should submit your application as soon as possible,
because first
> application round ends February 23, 2007.
> 
> 
> 2. Project Workshops
> 
> We would like to remember you not to forget to register
for project
> workshops. Similar to the years before we will offer
you so called
> "Workshop Rooms". Our plan is to jointly
organise a "projects to
> projects program" or "developer to developer
program". As last year the
> schedule will be published on LinuxTag's website, so
the schedule will
> be announced more widely.
> 
> The main purpose for these rooms is to provide
attending projects an
> opportunity to talk to other developers (not
necessarily from the same
> project) and to go into detail for a larger group than
what would be
> possible at the booth. Please note: all workshops will
be open to the
> public and will be announced so. In special cases we
can make an
> exception, but we would like to discuss this in detail
with you, if you
> think a session should be non-public. LinuxTag provides
presentation
> equipment and probably Internet connectivity for all
five rooms. You can
> register for a workshop using your VCC-account and
submit it like a
> paper using category "Project Workshop".
Normally a slot is 60 Minutes,
> if your workshop takes longer leave us a note within
your abstract. Also
> do so, if you have a preference for the day.
> 
> You can neglect the licence because it is not planned
to distribute your
> submission (like a paper for the conference program).
But please do not
> forget to choose the language for your workshop
submission. English may
> be your language of choice, but it is a valuable
information for an
> interested visitor.
> 
> Please register as soon as possible.
> 
> 
> 
> If you have any questions feel free to contact us.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Susanne Pfeifer, Wolfgang Drotschmann, Marko Jung &
Martin Schulte
> Project Committee LinuxTag 2007
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.linuxtag.org/2007/en/community/projects/
cfpro.html
> [2] http://www.linuxtag.org/
vcc/
> 
-- 
Gerold Kassube
-Vorstandsvorsitzender-

Linux Usergroup Lörrach e.V.
Marie-Curie-Strasse 8
79539 Lörrach
                         _
ASCII ribbon campaign   ( )
 - against HTML email    X
             & vCards   / 


-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-listredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mark
eting-list
country flaguser name
Germany
2007-02-07 06:29:23
Team,

with my account of last year ...
I did, what I have to do; I started the request of Projects
and begun
the explanation for the Fedora Booth at the Linuxtag.
In the next few days I come back with a alot of questions
regarding the
Linuxtag because I need your help, also your knowledge and
manpower
there ...

Regards

Gerold

> -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
> > Von: Marko Jung|LinuxTag <mjunglinuxtag.org>
> > Antwort an: projects-announcelinuxtag.org, Marko Jung|LinuxTag
> > <mjunglinuxtag.org>
> > An: projects-announcelinuxtag.org
> > Betreff: [LT06-Pro-Announce] Infomail #1, Februar
7, 2007
> > Datum: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 10:35:44 +0100
> > 
> > Dear Project,
> > 
> > with this mailing we would like to inform you
about:
> >   o Call for Projects
> >   o Project Workshops
> > 
> > 
> > 1. Call for Projects
> > 
> > Today we start the official 'Call for Projects' to
exhibit at the
> > 13th LinuxTag, May 30 - June 3, 2007 at
Messegelände unter dem Funkturm,
> > Berlin, Germany. Detailed information can be found
at LinuxTag's website
> > [1]. Please take a look at our terms and read the
FAQ. (An English
> > translation of the FAQ will be provided soon.)
> > 
> > The project committee has a very hard job to
decide for some projects
> > whether they will get a booth (sponsored by
LinuxTag) or we have to
> > charge them for it because of its strong
commercial background. This
> > decision is not easy to make and differs in each
case, but we try to
> > make it fair for everybody. Therefore we have
updated the Virtual
> > Conference Center [2] with some new questions
concerning your projects
> > contributors and community. By providing us as
much information as
> > possible, you can help us to ensure that only
non-commercial projects
> > can benefit from the sponsored booths.
> > 
> > You should submit your application as soon as
possible, because first
> > application round ends February 23, 2007.
> > 
> > 
> > 2. Project Workshops
> > 
> > We would like to remember you not to forget to
register for project
> > workshops. Similar to the years before we will
offer you so called
> > "Workshop Rooms". Our plan is to jointly
organise a "projects to
> > projects program" or "developer to
developer program". As last year the
> > schedule will be published on LinuxTag's website,
so the schedule will
> > be announced more widely.
> > 
> > The main purpose for these rooms is to provide
attending projects an
> > opportunity to talk to other developers (not
necessarily from the same
> > project) and to go into detail for a larger group
than what would be
> > possible at the booth. Please note: all workshops
will be open to the
> > public and will be announced so. In special cases
we can make an
> > exception, but we would like to discuss this in
detail with you, if you
> > think a session should be non-public. LinuxTag
provides presentation
> > equipment and probably Internet connectivity for
all five rooms. You can
> > register for a workshop using your VCC-account and
submit it like a
> > paper using category "Project Workshop".
Normally a slot is 60 Minutes,
> > if your workshop takes longer leave us a note
within your abstract. Also
> > do so, if you have a preference for the day.
> > 
> > You can neglect the licence because it is not
planned to distribute your
> > submission (like a paper for the conference
program). But please do not
> > forget to choose the language for your workshop
submission. English may
> > be your language of choice, but it is a valuable
information for an
> > interested visitor.
> > 
> > Please register as soon as possible.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > If you have any questions feel free to contact
us.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Susanne Pfeifer, Wolfgang Drotschmann, Marko Jung
& Martin Schulte
> > Project Committee LinuxTag 2007
> > 
> > 
> > [1] http://www.linuxtag.org/2007/en/community/projects/
cfpro.html
> > [2] http://www.linuxtag.org/
vcc/
> > 
> --
> Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
> Fedora-ambassadors-listredhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-am
bassadors-list
-- 
Gerold Kassube
-Vorstandsvorsitzender-

Linux Usergroup Lörrach e.V.
Marie-Curie-Strasse 8
79539 Lörrach
                         _
ASCII ribbon campaign   ( )
 - against HTML email    X
             & vCards   / 


-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-listredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mark
eting-list
Benchmark Vista / Fedora /Unbutu
country flaguser name
France
2007-02-08 09:59:27
Good Afternoon Fedora Team,

This is the first benchmark under Vista, Fedora and Unbutu.
I read on the jeuvinux french website
(h
ttp://www.jeuvinux.net/article.php3?id_article=100) a
very interesting
benchmark between Vista, Fedora and Ubuntu under 3
differents games :
* Quake 4
* Enemy Territory
* Unreal Tournament 2004

The hardware conf is very good :
Cpu : Intel Core2Duo 6400  2,13Ghz
Mobo : Asus P5B
Mémory : 2 x 1Go
Graphical Card : ATI Radeon X850XT en PCI-e 16x
Hard Drive : Samsung SATA 80Go – Cache 8Mo

The result is very poor for Vista under Quake 4 and Enemy
Territory.

Just look at the benchmark graph.

Best regards

Armel






-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-listredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mark
eting-list

Re: Benchmark Vista / Fedora /Unbutu
country flaguser name
Mexico
2007-02-08 11:30:36
Armelk escribió:
> Good Afternoon Fedora Team,
>
> This is the first benchmark under Vista, Fedora and
Unbutu.
> I read on the jeuvinux french website
> (h
ttp://www.jeuvinux.net/article.php3?id_article=100) a
very interesting
> benchmark between Vista, Fedora and Ubuntu under 3
differents games :
> * Quake 4
> * Enemy Territory
> * Unreal Tournament 2004
>
> The hardware conf is very good :
> Cpu : Intel Core2Duo 6400  2,13Ghz
> Mobo : Asus P5B
> Mémory : 2 x 1Go
> Graphical Card : ATI Radeon X850XT en PCI-e 16x
> Hard Drive : Samsung SATA 80Go – Cache 8Mo
>
> The result is very poor for Vista under Quake 4 and
Enemy Territory.
>
> Just look at the benchmark graph.
>
> Best regards
>
> Armel
>
>   

Interesting results, albeit, the UT2004 wasn't an
Apples-to-Apples (pun 
intended) comparison, as the Windows version was ran with
the DirectX 
renderer instead of the OpenGL one (as evidenced by the huge
leap in 
performance), which is the one used on Linux, it would be
much more 
acurate to see one with OpenGL on the Windows version.
However the ATi 
driver isn't what you'd call a speeder either, and it
apparently isn't 
so too in Windows, at least for OpenGL, nevertheless, these
are 
interesting results... Also was Aero enabled for the tests?
Aero has a 
DirectX context opened at all times, so DirectX apps will
obviously run 
faster than OpenGL (a secondary API running at the same time
as Aero, 
which might explain the poor OpenGL performance)

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-listredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mark
eting-list

Re: Benchmark Vista / Fedora /Unbutu
user name
2007-02-08 12:34:28
I also read here http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/17/gameplay-only-gets-worse-with-vista/ about Vista driver´s problems that arent yet ready.
Anyways, I also think the aero interface would supose negative performance, so turning it off before playing would be ideal.

On 2/8/07, Gian Paolo Mureddu < gmuredduprodigy.net.mx">gmuredduprodigy.net.mx> wrote:
Armelk escribió:
> Good Afternoon Fedora Team,
>
> This is the first benchmark under Vista, Fedora and Unbutu.
&gt; I read on the jeuvinux french website
&gt; ( http://www.jeuvinux.net/article.php3?id_article=100) a very interesting
> benchmark between Vista, Fedora and Ubuntu under 3 differents games :
> * Quake 4
> * Enemy Territory
> * Unreal Tournament 2004
>;
> The hardware conf is very good :
> Cpu : Intel Core2Duo 6400 2,13Ghz
&gt; Mobo : Asus P5B
> Mémory : 2 x 1Go
> Graphical Card : ATI Radeon X850XT en PCI-e 16x
> Hard Drive : Samsung SATA 80Go – Cache 8Mo
>
> The result is very poor for Vista under Quake 4 and Enemy Territory.
>
> Just look at the benchmark graph.
>;
> Best regards
&gt;
> Armel
>
>

Interesting results, albeit, the UT2004 wasn't an Apples-to-Apples (pun
intended) comparison, as the Windows version was ran with the DirectX
renderer instead of the OpenGL one (as evidenced by the huge leap in
performance), which is the one used on Linux, it would be much more
acurate to see one with OpenGL on the Windows version. However the ATi
driver isn't what you'd call a speeder either, and it apparently isn't
so too in Windows, at least for OpenGL, nevertheless, these are
interesting results... Also was Aero enabled for the tests? Aero has a
DirectX context opened at all times, so DirectX apps will obviously run
faster than OpenGL (a secondary API running at the same time as Aero,
which might explain the poor OpenGL performance)

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-listredhat.com">Fedora-marketing-listredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: Benchmark Vista / Fedora /Unbutu
user name
2007-02-08 12:40:16
Hi,
for the fun the ati driver version in fedora install is upper then the other. and this show the work of developer to give for fedora user the best product.
thank you
2007/2/8, John Mackay < mackay3gmail.com">mackay3gmail.com>:
I also read here http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/17/gameplay-only-gets-worse-with-vista/ about Vista driver´s problems that arent yet ready.
Anyways, I also think the aero interface would supose negative performance, so turning it off before playing would be ideal.


On 2/8/07, Gian Paolo Mureddu < gmuredduprodigy.net.mx" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">gmuredduprodigy.net.mx> wrote:
Armelk escribió:
> Good Afternoon Fedora Team,
>
> This is the first benchmark under Vista, Fedora and Unbutu.
&gt; I read on the jeuvinux french website
&gt; ( http://www.jeuvinux.net/article.php3?id_article=100) a very interesting
> benchmark between Vista, Fedora and Ubuntu under 3 differents games :
> * Quake 4
> * Enemy Territory
> * Unreal Tournament 2004
>;
> The hardware conf is very good :
> Cpu : Intel Core2Duo 6400 2,13Ghz
&gt; Mobo : Asus P5B
> Mémory : 2 x 1Go
> Graphical Card : ATI Radeon X850XT en PCI-e 16x
> Hard Drive : Samsung SATA 80Go – Cache 8Mo
>
> The result is very poor for Vista under Quake 4 and Enemy Territory.
>
> Just look at the benchmark graph.
>;
> Best regards
&gt;
> Armel
>
>

Interesting results, albeit, the UT2004 wasn't an Apples-to-Apples (pun
intended) comparison, as the Windows version was ran with the DirectX
renderer instead of the OpenGL one (as evidenced by the huge leap in
performance), which is the one used on Linux, it would be much more
acurate to see one with OpenGL on the Windows version. However the ATi
driver isn't what you'd call a speeder either, and it apparently isn't
so too in Windows, at least for OpenGL, nevertheless, these are
interesting results... Also was Aero enabled for the tests? Aero has a
DirectX context opened at all times, so DirectX apps will obviously run
faster than OpenGL (a secondary API running at the same time as Aero,
which might explain the poor OpenGL performance)

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-listredhat.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">Fedora-marketing-listredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
redhat.com">Fedora-marketing-listredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list



--
M'BAREK Med Nihed,
Fedora Ambassador, TUNISIA, Northern Africa
Re: Benchmark Vista / Fedora /Unbutu
country flaguser name
Mexico
2007-02-08 12:50:58
nihed mbarek escribió:
> Hi,
> for the fun the ati driver version in fedora install is
upper then the 
> other. and this show the work of developer to give for
fedora user the 
> best product.
> thank you

Interesting... I did not notice it... In any case, kudos
should go to 
the livna packagers of the ATi drivers! KUDOS!

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-listredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mark
eting-list

[1-7]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )