Is anyone running FMS 2 on Fedora?

 There
Windows would win.

Actually with "faster" I meant being able to
handle more simultaneous connections

On 8/9/06, Stefan Richter <stefanflashcomguru.com> wrote:
> Faster how? You mean faster to install?  
>
>
> > [mailto:flashcomm-bounceschattyfig.figleaf.com] On
Behalf Of
> > Alexander Farber
> >
> > Continuing with the twisted humour, I wonder on
what OS would
> > FMS be faster given the same HW... 
> >

-- 
http://preferans.de
_______________________________________________
FlashCommchattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.c
om

Alexander Farber wrote:
> 
There Windows would win.
>
> Actually with "faster" I meant being able
to
> handle more simultaneous connections
We didn't try with fms2.
But we tried (a lot) with fcs 1.5.2
windows was MUCH faster than linux there too. (cpu usage,
ram usage, etc)
(but it's due to fcs implementation)

Dario De Agostini

_______________________________________________
FlashCommchattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.c
om