What about the epiphany date server/bookmarks db

> I want tracker to be the best bookmark database ever
(as well as the
> best music db, photo db, contact db etc) but I need
specs...

me too 

the thing is I'm going to be busy until monday and I will
leave for a
place without permanent internet connection Wednesday...

I will be back the 7 August.

Whatever I will think about this.

You want to add this dependencie in the gnome desktop... I
mean mysql,
you shoul notice the board or something like this ? (about
the
license)

Is tracker supporting tags ?
_______________________________________________
epiphany-list mailing list
epiphany-listgnome.org

http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list

> Is tracker supporting tags ?

I agree, it is a stupid question. 

Well we'd better deal about the epiphany case first.

the new bookmark system should be implemented in parallel or
create a
generic set of API to query a desktop wide database and let
people/distro choose one (beagle/tracker/... ?).
"standardised" API ?


---

What is a bookmark :
- URI
- NAME
- Tags

URI maybe a lot of thing ftp, http, but also lastfm, radio,
webtv,
podcast, rss... ?

as it may be harder to to process each URI, it should be in
different
table: one table per 'protocol'.



We need to analyse history to build an intelligent desktop.

History elements would be just special bookmarks (with a
special tag ?)

Tracker may process regularly history to build its
'intelligence'.

Intelligence must be subdomains aware but not assumes that I
love
http://www.livejournal.co
m/ if I regularly go to
http://jamiemcc.live
journal.com/ (if I haven't livejournal.com in my
bookmarks it isn't a problem)
_______________________________________________
epiphany-list mailing list
epiphany-listgnome.org

http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list

AMAZIGH Aneglus wrote:
>> Is tracker supporting tags ?
> 
> I agree, it is a stupid question. 
> 
> Well we'd better deal about the epiphany case first.
> 
> the new bookmark system should be implemented in
parallel or create a
> generic set of API to query a desktop wide database and
let
> people/distro choose one (beagle/tracker/... ?).
"standardised" API ?

Not necessary - tracker can be used as a stand-alone
metadata database 
without any indexing (its lightweight enough).

So whether you prefer Beagle or simply dont want any
indexing, tracker 
can still fit the bill.

tracker will also be proposed for Gnome 2.18.

As tracker uses dbus it is also possible for another process
to 
re-impelement the exact same bookmark/history dbus
interfaces of tracker 
using different technologies if they prefer.


-- 
Mr Jamie McCracken
http://jamiemcc.live
journal.com/

_______________________________________________
epiphany-list mailing list
epiphany-listgnome.org

http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list

> Not necessary - tracker can be used as a stand-alone
metadata database
> without any indexing (its lightweight enough).

> So whether you prefer Beagle or simply dont want any
indexing, tracker
> can still fit the bill.

Tracker will just manage the database, won't it ?

Actually we will :
- Build history, bookmarks database in/with Tracker
- add a dbus interface to epiphany to request history and
bookmarks.
- add to Tracker a way to handle these requests

> tracker will also be proposed for Gnome 2.18.

Fine .
1 year is too much!
_______________________________________________
epiphany-list mailing list
epiphany-listgnome.org

http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list