List Info

Thread: Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.




Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.
country flaguser name
Hong Kong
2007-04-14 09:47:11
Rick C. Petty wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 10:54:17AM +0200, Dag-Erling
Sm?rgrav wrote:
>> Our native atomic operations are all defined as
either macros or
>> static inline functions in machine/atomic.h, so we
can easily make
>> this choice at compile time based on a config
option.
> 
> Is there any way we could make the choice at boot time,
by checking for
> presence of the CX8 feature?  Either as something
like:
> 
> extern int feature_cx8;		/* or MIB variable */
> #define CMPXCHG8(a)	(feature_cx8 ? { _asm
"..." } : emulate_cmpxch8(a))
> 

In Linux,
Two copies of code are compiled: one with cmpxch8, one
without.
They are placed into different sections.

When the computer boot up, it choose the best code,
update the pointers then free the unused codes memory.

> Otherwise something like ZFS which utilizes this
feature a lot could
> check the MIB variable and set different fn ptr in its
device structure,
> or something along those lines.  Of course, that would
require compiling
> the same code twice essentially, but it had the
advantage that it would
> work on non-CX8 systems and that it would be fast on
systems with CX8.
> 
> -- Rick C. Petty

-- 

_______________________________________________
freebsd-fsfreebsd.org mailing list

http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-fs-unsubscribefreebsd.org"

[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )