List Info

Thread: Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x




Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
user name
2008-04-22 06:54:07
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:31:45PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier
wrote:
> On Thu, 21-Feb-2008 at 14:13:22 +0200, Kostik Belousov
wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:20:04AM -0700, Brett
Bump wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I cannot reproduce it locally. With
patch applied, it compiles both
> > > > GENERIC and GENERIC with options QUOTA
added just fine.
> > > >
> > > > Check for partially applied patch.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Thanks Kostik.  You can double check me on
sizes, but it would appear that
> > > all files in the patch were touched, and I
double checked my sources with:
> > >
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/6.2-RELEASE/
src which are
> > The patch is against RELENG_6, not against
RELENG_6_2. I see no point
> > in backporting it to RELENG_6_2.
> > 
> > BTW, I backported two fixes, one for another
deadlock with snapshots and
> > quotas, another for "ffs_blkfree: block
already freed" panic and followed
> > up fsck: softdep inconsistency error.
> > 
> > New combined patch (against RELENG_6) is at
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/quot
agiant/quotas-RELENG_6-20080221-1202.patch
> 
> I tried to apply this patch to recent RELENG_6 sources
> but it failed at a lot of places. I think this is due
to
> changes to the tree after the above patch was made.
> 
> Is there any newer patch available or is it possible to
make
> one which applies to recent RELENG_6 sources?

http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/quot
agiant/quotas-RELENG_6-20080422-1000.patch

May be, I shall commit it finally.
Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
user name
2008-04-22 11:34:30
On Tue, 22-Apr-2008 at 14:54:07 +0300, Kostik Belousov
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:31:45PM +0200, Andre
Albsmeier wrote:
> > On Thu, 21-Feb-2008 at 14:13:22 +0200, Kostik
Belousov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:20:04AM -0700,
Brett Bump wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Kostik Belousov
wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > I cannot reproduce it locally. With
patch applied, it compiles both
> > > > > GENERIC and GENERIC with options
QUOTA added just fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > Check for partially applied patch.
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks Kostik.  You can double check me
on sizes, but it would appear that
> > > > all files in the patch were touched, and
I double checked my sources with:
> > > >
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/6.2-RELEASE/
src which are
> > > The patch is against RELENG_6, not against
RELENG_6_2. I see no point
> > > in backporting it to RELENG_6_2.
> > > 
> > > BTW, I backported two fixes, one for another
deadlock with snapshots and
> > > quotas, another for "ffs_blkfree: block
already freed" panic and followed
> > > up fsck: softdep inconsistency error.
> > > 
> > > New combined patch (against RELENG_6) is at
> > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/quot
agiant/quotas-RELENG_6-20080221-1202.patch
> > 
> > I tried to apply this patch to recent RELENG_6
sources
> > but it failed at a lot of places. I think this is
due to
> > changes to the tree after the above patch was
made.
> > 
> > Is there any newer patch available or is it
possible to make
> > one which applies to recent RELENG_6 sources?
> 
> http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/quot
agiant/quotas-RELENG_6-20080422-1000.patch

That was a quick one, thanks a lot!

	-Andre

> 
> May be, I shall commit it finally.



-- 
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performancefreebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-p
erformance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-performance-unsubscribefreebsd.org"

[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )