device polling on 6.2-stable..use? yes/no?

Anyone using device polling on 6.2stable (i386) ?
I have been reading up on this and seen some good and some
bad but 
nothing definitive.

I have bge NICs in these machines and they are running as
routers, 
and  running pf.

When I enabled it in the kernel and then via rc.conf (since
sysctl 
use is depreciated now) ...I can see a difference in
"vmstat -i"
presuming thats the correct way to check.

With polling DISABLED...vmstat shows ever increasing values
for example:

vmstat -i
interrupt                          total       rate
irq4: sio0                             3          0
irq6: fdc0                            10          0
irq14: ata0                        12210          0
irq15: ata1                        78834          2
irq22: bge0                       430416         11
irq23: bge1                       917826         24
cpu0: timer                     75098549       2000
cpu1: timer                     75092636       1999
Total                          151630484       4038

and when I do a large network operation (like ftp an ISO) it

increases and increases....however, with device polling
compiled and 
configured (all default values though in sysctl) - I do not
see an 
increase in vmstat numbers for the nics...I figured thats
good...but 
I might be wrong?

I dont do anything higher than WAN(10MB) and LAN(100MB).

But if anyone has any suggestions or comments  -especially
values to 
adjust in sysctl, please chime in.

TIA

-JD

_______________________________________________
freebsd-questionsfreebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-que
stions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-questions-unsubscribefreebsd.org"

On Tuesday 26 June 2007, JD Bronson wrote:
> Anyone using device polling on 6.2stable (i386) ?
I have been using it.
> I have been reading up on this and seen some good and
some bad but
> nothing definitive.
Basically you improve efficiency at the cost of latency, so
expect lower CPU 
usage. To reduce latency one can increase HZ.
>
> I have bge NICs in these machines and they are running
as routers,
> and  running pf.
>
> When I enabled it in the kernel and then via rc.conf
(since sysctl
> use is depreciated now) ...I can see a difference in
"vmstat -i"
> presuming thats the correct way to check.
Yes that would work.
>
> With polling DISABLED...vmstat shows ever increasing
values for example:
>
> vmstat -i
> interrupt                          total       rate
> irq4: sio0                             3          0
> irq6: fdc0                            10          0
> irq14: ata0                        12210          0
> irq15: ata1                        78834          2
> irq22: bge0                       430416         11
> irq23: bge1                       917826         24
> cpu0: timer                     75098549       2000
> cpu1: timer                     75092636       1999
> Total                          151630484       4038
>
> and when I do a large network operation (like ftp an
ISO) it
> increases and increases....however, with device polling
compiled and
> configured (all default values though in sysctl) - I do
not see an
> increase in vmstat numbers for the nics...I figured
thats good...but
> I might be wrong?
Yup that's good. With polling off, you should never see it
increase much 
beyond ~8000 interrupts/sec, the theoretical limit for an
100mbit connection 
with 1500 mtu while doing a big transfer. You can also check
with 
systat -vmstat 1.
>
> I dont do anything higher than WAN(10MB) and
LAN(100MB).
>
> But if anyone has any suggestions or comments 
-especially values to
> adjust in sysctl, please chime in.
If you want lower latency (or if you experience packet loss)
you could set
the kern.hz tunable (in loader.conf) to something higher
than the default 
1000. I believe that people have been using 10000 for busy
routers. Note that 
this will increase CPU load when the system has no packets
to process.
>
> TIA
>
> -JD

Cheers,
Pieter de GOeje
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questionsfreebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-que
stions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-questions-unsubscribefreebsd.org"