List Info

Thread: "Drop in" replacement for imap-UW?




"Drop in" replacement for imap-UW?
country flaguser name
United States
2007-12-31 13:42:14
I've been running imap-UW on FreeBSD 6.x STABLE for a while.
Clients are 
mostly Thunderbird, TREOs and Horde (running on the same
box.

I'm having issues when multiple clients try to access the
same user's 
mailbox. Typically the TREO will do a scheduled check for
new mail while 
Thunderbird has it already open. Research indicates that
this is a 
limitation of the UW imapd implementation.

Can anyone recommend a good and secure imapd implementation
that won't 
require a ton of reconfiguration? Mostly I'd like the
replacement to be 
able to use all the existing end-user imap folders and mail
spools. All 
users have accounts and mail spools on the box. There's no
virtual users 
or database authentication backends to deal with.

        TIA     ...jgm

_______________________________________________
freebsd-questionsfreebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-que
stions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-questions-unsubscribefreebsd.org"

Re: "Drop in" replacement for imap-UW?
user name
2007-12-31 14:59:01
On Monday 31 December 2007 01:42:14 pm Joe in MPLS wrote:
> I've been running imap-UW on FreeBSD 6.x STABLE for a
while. Clients are
> mostly Thunderbird, TREOs and Horde (running on the
same box.
>
> I'm having issues when multiple clients try to access
the same user's
> mailbox. Typically the TREO will do a scheduled check
for new mail while
> Thunderbird has it already open. Research indicates
that this is a
> limitation of the UW imapd implementation.
>
> Can anyone recommend a good and secure imapd
implementation that won't
> require a ton of reconfiguration? Mostly I'd like the
replacement to be
> able to use all the existing end-user imap folders and
mail spools. All
> users have accounts and mail spools on the box. There's
no virtual users
> or database authentication backends to deal with.
>
>         TIA     ...jgm

im not having any trouble using kmail from my freebsd
desktop, thunderbird 
from my mac, and outlook from my pocketpc all at the same
time, using 
dovecot.

cheers,
-- 
Jonathan Horne
http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org
freebsddfwlp.com
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questionsfreebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-que
stions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-questions-unsubscribefreebsd.org"

Re: "Drop in" replacement for imap-UW?
country flaguser name
United Kingdom
2007-12-31 15:45:24
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:42:14 -0600
Joe in MPLS <joegracenpeace.net> wrote:

> I'm having issues when multiple clients try to access
the same user's 
> mailbox. Typically the TREO will do a scheduled check
for new mail
> while Thunderbird has it already open. Research
indicates that this
> is a limitation of the UW imapd implementation.

Could it be the deadlock bug that's fixed in the latest
release (2006k):

http://www.washington.edu/imap/documentation/RELNOTES.
html

 
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questionsfreebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-que
stions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-questions-unsubscribefreebsd.org"

[1-3]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )