stan wrote:
[ ... ]
>>Yes and no. Masquerading is for mail which passes
through the server,
>>which includes mail being delivered locally from
some other machine.
>
> OK, that makes sense.
>
> Next question, since sendmail is _already_ rewriting
the address, why will
> adding still more rewritng stop it from doing what it
is doing now, since
> Masquerading isn't enabled presently.
There's a big long discussion of this in cf/README, but
reasonable people have
been known to find sendmail documentation non-informative.
It might be the case that using statements of the form:
VIRTUSER_DOMAIN(`example.com')dnl
...in your .mc file may help exclude them from
canonification.
It may also be the case that what you want to do is going to
be better handled
by two SMTP servers, one as an external gateway, using and
exposed to DNS and
your wildcard MX records, and one internal mailserver which
handles local
delivery, masquerading, a mailertable distributing mail to
any other local SMTP
destinations (think mailserver/listservers running on other
machines), and even
use FEATURE nocanonify if you want to/have to disregard DNS
entirely.
Put a spamfilter/virusfilter on your external relay, which
will then serve as
your SMART_HOST for the internal mailserver.
--
-Chuck
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-que
stions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|