OpenLDAP+nss_ldap+nss_modules separated patch and more (SoC)

Doug Barton wrote:
> Michael Bushkov wrote:
>
>> Well, maybe more compromise solution will be to
have OpenLDAP and
>> nss_ldap in the base, but to have them turned off
by default, so the user
>> would need to specify WITH_LDAP and WITH_NSS_LDAP
in the make.conf to
>> build them.
>
> It isn't requiring the user to build it that I'm
worried about. However, I
> refuse to continue tilting against this windmill. Given
that I'm the only
> one who seems to object to this, I withdraw my
objection, and
> correspondingly reserve the right to wave the "I
told you this was a bad
> idea" sign if it all blows up down the road.

Ok - If it all blows up down the road, I'll stick the
"he warned me" sign to 
my forehead 

>
> Meanwhile, I agree with Brooks, if it's in the base,
it needs to be on by
> default.

I agree too.

>> And we should also have rewritten nss_ldap in ports
(call it
>> nss_ldap_bsd, for example).
>
> Why?

Why not? It will be useful for somebody who'll want to use
our nss_ldap 
instead of the PADL's one (I hope these times to come  and will
want to 
maintain it only via ports.

With best regards,
Michael Bushkov 

_______________________________________________
freebsd-currentfreebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-curre
nt
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-current-unsubscribefreebsd.org"