Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 10:16:46PM -0700, Joel
Brobecker wrote:
>> Basically, the reason for the warning is that GDB
thinks that the
>> inferior unloaded ld.so.1. The reason for that is
that, during startup,
>> GDB does not immediately have access to base
address of the dynamic
>> linker structs. I suspect that this is because our
real inferior
>> hasn't been forked yet, or maybe is in the process
of being forked.
>> I haven't had time to look further into this.
>
> It's because you've forked, but the dynamic linker has
not run yet.
> This is code I added recently. The first time, we get
the name of the
> dynamic linker from the contents of .interp. Later,
after it's run,
> we get it from the inferior's link_map list.
>
> Maybe a gdbarch hook to override the name of the
default dynamic
> linker? That's really bizarre though. Maybe the
OpenSolaris sources
> give some insight to how it came up with /lib/ld.so.1.
>
>
This "unexpected warning" is also the one that
causes the TUI to crash
under Solaris.
See the thread "TUI + gdbserver broken?" at url :
(http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2007-03/m
sg00169.html)
Removing that warning (I've tried that as well) will remove
that problem
too, but it's only a side effect. I think we should fix both
separately
but when you'll have removed think warning, the TUI bug will
become
invisible.
--
Denis
|
