On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 18:01:20 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
...
> So it seems that Linux completely ignores SIGSTOP if a
process is
> already stopped. That's the right thing to do for
"normal" processes,
> but not ok for traced processes. Looks like fixing
that would solve a
> lot of problems.
Unfortunately it would break compatibility. This is what
the UTRACE code from
Roland McGrath is going to do, so far it provides only the
backward compatible
utrace(2) interface.
Jan
|