snapshot naming

recently, the snapshots were changed from
'gdb-weekly-x.y.z.stamp...' 
to 'gdb-weekly-x.y.z_stamp...'.  is there a reason for 
the ".stamp" -> "_stamp" change ? 
this breaks my scripts considering all of 
<=6.6.* uses .stamp and >=6.7.* uses _stamp ...
-mike

On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 10:28:09PM -0400, Mike Frysinger
wrote:
> recently, the snapshots were changed from
'gdb-weekly-x.y.z.stamp...' 
> to 'gdb-weekly-x.y.z_stamp...'.  is there a reason for

> the ".stamp" -> "_stamp" change
?  this breaks my scripts considering all of 
> <=6.6.* uses .stamp and >=6.7.* uses _stamp ...
> -mike

Joel, was this intentional or accidental?

drowcaradoc:/space/fsf/commit/src/gdb% cvs up -p -D '7
weeks ago' version.in
6.6.50.20070906-cvs
drowcaradoc:/space/fsf/commit/src/gdb% cvs up -p -D '6
weeks ago' version.in
6.7.50-20070913-cvs

-6.6.50.20070911-cvs
+6.7.50-20070911-cvs

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

> Joel, was this intentional or accidental?

Hmmm, no, not at all! Thanks for catching this. I'll fix
ASAP (unless
you'd like to do it now). I'll try to add some
sanity-checking to
my scripts too.

Thanks,
-- 
Joel

On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 03:09:23PM -0700, Joel Brobecker
wrote:
> > Joel, was this intentional or accidental?
> 
> Hmmm, no, not at all! Thanks for catching this. I'll
fix ASAP (unless
> you'd like to do it now). I'll try to add some
sanity-checking to
> my scripts too.

There's no rush, but I may as well do it now since I have a
checkout
right here   Fixed.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

On Thursday 25 October 2007, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 03:09:23PM -0700, Joel
Brobecker wrote:
> > > Joel, was this intentional or accidental?
> >
> > Hmmm, no, not at all! Thanks for catching this.
I'll fix ASAP (unless
> > you'd like to do it now). I'll try to add some
sanity-checking to
> > my scripts too.
>
> There's no rush, but I may as well do it now since I
have a checkout
> right here   Fixed.

thanks guys !
-mike

> There's no rush, but I may as well do it now since I
have a checkout
> right here   Fixed.

Thanks! I just found that this was an issue with the script
that
does the version number update, so I fixed it and it not
happen again.

-- 
Joel