Re: Problems while debugging fortran

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:33:36PM -0700, Joel
Brobecker wrote:
>> Question to the other GDB contributors/maintainers:
Is it going to
>> hurt GDB if we fallback to using
"DW_AT_calling_convention =
>> DW_CC_program" to find the main? The DWARF3
manual says that this
>> attribute value was <<intended to support
Fortran main programs>>.
>> This is very unclear, since they don't explain what
"support"
>> refers to. But for people stuck with XLF, if we can
improve their
>> lives without hurting the rest of GDB, I'm ok with
compromising and
>> using this attribute value be used to find the
main.
>
> Yes, this does seem sensible.
>
Great, I can come up with a patch shortly.

Regards,

- --
Carlos Eduardo Seo
Software Engineer
IBM Linux Technology Center
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org


iD8DBQFHH6gQqvq7Aov/qQARAqtMAJsGCQ0/78OVWVih/pDeuiI7v/JoBACe
MROe
L3EmicoHS4bLQklrxVtitIw=
=eb45
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Carlos Eduardo Seo wrote:
>
>
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>> Yes, this does seem sensible.
>
> Great, I can come up with a patch shortly.
>
> Regards,
>

Actually, I was re-reading this thread and I think we can
use Wu
Zhou's patch mentioned before. I've just refreshed it so it
applies
cleanly on CVS head and it's working fine with my Fortran
binaries.
What do you think? Any modifications suggested?

Regards,

- --
Carlos Eduardo Seo
Software Engineer
IBM Linux Technology Center
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org


iD8DBQFHH7+eqvq7Aov/qQARAjNoAJ4hHCpEk9u1+gW/B5uVen+Rq0XWLwCe
J+9z
KjKTK0t2acXQaM+HbLkT6/Y=
=UjNN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----