Re: Question about Dwarf2 for VLIW processor

the address range of that line is from 0x800003c5 to
0x800003cf
but what find_pc_line_pc_range returned is from 0x800003c5
to 0x800003cb.

It do not cause problem now, maybe in the future, I am not
sure about 
this, any advices?

Thanks.

Wang Jiong 

  tel:2254



Daniel Jacobowitz <drowfalse.org> 
2007-11-08 09:41



To
wangjiongsunnorth.com.cn
cc
gdbsourceware.org
Subject
Re: Question about Dwarf2 for VLIW processor






On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:26:28AM +0800, wangjiongsunnorth.com.cn wrote:
> Dear Joel:
> 
>         I am using GDB6.1.1
> 
>         GDB did not stop at the wrong location now, but
I have see that 
> the function:
> 
>         find_pc_line_pc_range (stop_pc,
&step_range_start, 
> &step_range_end) didn`t work correctly.

Why is this behavior not correct?  What problem does it
cause?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

> It do not cause problem now, maybe in the future, I am
not sure about 
> this, any advices?

It shouldn't actually cause any problem, neither now, nor in
the future.
You're correct that the current line table is suboptimal,
but GDB should
be able to deal with it.

-- 
Joel