Re: Multiple breakpoint locations

Andreas Schwab wrote:

> Nick Roberts <nickrobsnap.net.nz> writes:
> 
>> Yes, thanks.  It seems strange to me that the
return type needs to be
>> specified.  I thought with overloading, people
talked about signature
>> which is determined by the name and arguments but
not the return type.
> 
> For function templates the return type is part of the
signature (it can
> be parameterised with a template argument).

I'm not sure it's true. Consider:

        template<class T>
        T foo();

        template<class T>
        void bar();

The value of template parameter is indeed the part of
signature.
The return value does not seem to be, since it directly
depends
on template parameter, so:

        foo<int>()

quite uniquely specify the type of return value.

- Volodya