> Vladimir wrote:
> I've noticed that right now, both -break-delete and
-break-disable
> commands accept several breakpoint ids, like:
> -break-disable 1 2 3
> This behaviour comes almost by accident, and is not
documented
> anywhere. The question is -- should we document it and
add tests, or
> should we declare this behaviour does not exist? I
would disallow it.
> Keep it simple
It's documented alright...
-break-disable ( breakpoint )+
Notice the + character in the MI definition!
I'm using this behaviour. Other IDEs would be too, I'd
imagine.
bjarke
____________________________________________________________
_____
Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger
http://imagine-msn.c
om/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=w
lmailtagline
|