Re: FW: -break-delete with several breakpoints

Bjarke Viksoe wrote:

> 
>> Vladimir  wrote:
>> I've noticed that right now, both -break-delete and
-break-disable
>> commands accept several breakpoint ids, like:
>>  -break-disable 1 2 3
>> This behaviour comes almost by accident, and is not
documented
>> anywhere. The question is -- should we document it
and add tests, or
>> should we declare this behaviour does not exist? I
would disallow it.
>> Keep it simple 
> 
> It's documented alright...
> 
>  -break-disable ( breakpoint )+
> 
> Notice the + character in the MI definition!

Ok, we'll keep it then.

> I'm using this behaviour. Other IDEs would be too, I'd
imagine.

For reference, which IDE are you using this behaviour in?

- Volodya