Pawel Piech wrote:
> I just think this shows how important it is that the
client be able to
> use the same protocol to communicate in either mode,
and be able to use
> the event data alone to determine what state actually
changed on the target.
Heh, I don't think so. Do you really think it's acceptable
to have a "non-stop"
checkbox in UI that will not actually work, and find out
that it does not work
only when your program stops for the first time -- stopping
all threads? I think
this is not acceptable in any way -- regardless of how
carefully and politely
gdb phrases "all threads stopped, your real time
application is messed up"
information.
- Volodya
|