List Info

Thread: MI: *stopped response without frame




MI: *stopped response without frame
user name
2006-04-25 12:51:52
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 12:32:07PM +0400, Vladimir Prus
wrote:
> I've two questions:
> 
> 1. Why is *stopped respose with
"end-stepping-range" as reason does not
>    include frame information?
> 2. What does
> 
>        Thread Event Breakpoint: gdb should not stop!
> 
>    mean?
> 
> I've also possible answer to those questions: the
situation happens when one
> of the thread exits (i.e. it's inside
__nptl_death_event). But then,
> -stack-list-frames has no problems showing we're
inside __nptl_death_event,
> so either stop reason should be something different,
line "thread-exited",
> or *stopped reply should include frame.

Or, have you considered, the error message might be correct?
  GDB
should not have stopped at all!  It's a bug somewhere.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )