Stephen,
The method names were initially generated by swig: swig
"camel-cased" the c delclaration in the SDL header
files to generate the method-names.
I agree that they could be merged. I kept them a part for
now with the thought it might keep debugging simpler (and
make it easier to remove parts if some of the libraries are
not installed.)
Kind regards,
Brad Watson
----- Original Message ----
From: Stephen Compall <s11 member.fsf.org>
To: help-smalltalk gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 4:27:38 PM
Subject: [Help-smalltalk] Re: GST SDL Bindings
> Object subclass: #SdlVideo
> ...
> category: 'SdlVideo Wrapper'! !
>
> Object subclass: #SdlThread
> ...
> category: 'SdlThread Wrapper'! !
Perhaps these etc. could be merged into a single category?
> imgLoadTypedRW: aCobject0 freeSrc: aInt1 type: aString2
Out of curiosity, why do the cCall method names all start
with type
prefixes?
--
Stephen Compall
http://scompall.no
candysw.com/blog
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
help-smalltalk gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
____________________________________________________________
________________________
Yahoo! Music Unlimited
Access over 1 million songs.
http://music.yahoo.c
om/unlimited
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
help-smalltalk gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
|