next release?

Hello,

I was wondering when a next official release will be
available.

Kind Regards,
Jo

--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-usersredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-dir
ectory-users

Jo De Troy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering when a next official release will be
available.
We don't really know yet.  We were hoping to have a beta of
version 1.1 
available within the next couple of weeks.  This would be
the new 
packaging of just the core DS i.e. the beta wouldn't have
the admin 
server, console, etc.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Jo
>
> -- 
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-usersredhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-dir
ectory-users
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-usersredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-dir
ectory-users

Richard Megginson wrote:
> Jo De Troy wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was wondering when a next official release will
be available.
> We don't really know yet.  We were hoping to have a
beta of version 
> 1.1 available within the next couple of weeks.  This
would be the new 
> packaging of just the core DS i.e. the beta wouldn't
have the admin 
> server, console, etc.

Will there be a 1.0.3?  I like the packaging well enough as
it is, and 
would like to see an official release with the SASL
encryption fix that 
was just checked into CVS.

--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-usersredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-dir
ectory-users

Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Richard Megginson wrote:
>> Jo De Troy wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I was wondering when a next official release
will be available.
>> We don't really know yet.  We were hoping to have a
beta of version 
>> 1.1 available within the next couple of weeks. 
This would be the new 
>> packaging of just the core DS i.e. the beta
wouldn't have the admin 
>> server, console, etc.
>
> Will there be a 1.0.3?
We hadn't planned on it.  Is there a lot of demand?  Would
it be 
possible to drop support for RHEL3 and Fedora Core 4 if we
do?
> I like the packaging well enough as it is, and would
like to see an 
> official release with the SASL encryption fix that was
just checked 
> into CVS.
>
> -- 
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-usersredhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-dir
ectory-users
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-usersredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-dir
ectory-users

Richard Megginson wrote:
> Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> Will there be a 1.0.3?
> We hadn't planned on it.  Is there a lot of demand? 
Would it be 
> possible to drop support for RHEL3 and Fedora Core 4 if
we do?

Can't speak for the level of demand, but I'd like to see a
1.0.x version 
that didn't break when using GSSAPI.  Maybe that's just
because I don't 
know what else is changing for 1.1.

I'm running 1.0.2 on RHEL 4.

--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-usersredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-dir
ectory-users

Richard Megginson wrote:
> We hadn't planned on it.  Is there a lot of demand? 
Would it be
> possible to drop support for RHEL3 and Fedora Core 4 if
we do?

I'd like to see support for RHEL3 continued.

David


--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-usersredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-dir
ectory-users

>> We hadn't planned on it.  Is there a lot of demand?
 Would it be 
>> possible to drop support for RHEL3 and Fedora Core
4 if we do?

I still have a lot of sites running FC3, simply because it's
the last
release with PHP 4 and PHP 5 breaks the PEAR LDAP module. 
If you are
going to support RHEL 4 then you may as well support FC3.

OTOH most of my FC4 sites have moved up to FC5.

-- 
Del
Babel Com Australia
http://www.babel.com.au/
ph: 02 9368 0728
fax: 02 9368 0758

--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-usersredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-dir
ectory-users