Brandon Young wrote:
> Hi All. I have been struggling with creating a Windows
Sync agreement
> that works the way I think it's supposed to. Maybe
someone can
> educate me as to what I'm doing wrong. Documentation
on this subject
> is sparse and incomplete. If I can get this problem
solved, I would
> be happy to contribute the detailed document on how I
did it back to
> this list. Sort of a "Complete Idiots Guide to
Windows Sync
> Agreements" or something.
>
> First, the way I *think* it's supposed to work ...
> 1. If I create an account or group in AD, it replicates
to FDS
> 2. If I create an account or group in FDS it replicates
to AD
> 3. If I change a user's password in one directory, it
updates in the
> other
>
>> From the Redhat documentation: "The Windows
Sync feature allows
> synchronization of adds, deletes and changes in groups,
user entries,
> and their passwords between Red Hat Directory Server
and both
> Microsoft Active Directory and Microsoft Windows NT 4.0
Server."
> Seems vague enough. I am left with a big question,
though: is it
> possible to replicate UNIX uid/gid information to
Active Directory?
No. Adding support for POSIX attributes is on our to-do
list.
> Somewhere along the path I got it in my head that I
needed to install
> Windows Services for UNIX in order to share UNIX
uid/gid/shell/homedir
> information between the two directories. Further, I
came to believe
> that the sync agreement code in the Directory Server
magically handles
> the translations between schemas ... that is to say, in
AD the UNIX
> uid is stored as MSSFU30uid (or something close to
that), while it's
> simply uid in FDS; and the sync code does that
translation.
>
> Is all that wishful thinking on my part? It does not
appear to work
> this way. I have SFU installed in AD. Any UNIX data I
put into AD
> does not replicate down to my FDS. Is there a way to
do what I'm
> talking about?
>
> Secondly, it has never been clear to me how changes on
the FDS side
> replicate back up to AD. Do I need to set the
replication up as
> Multimaster/Single Master/??
No, FDS doesn't use the MMR protocol to communicate with
AD.
>
> I'd appreciate any help someone may be able to give --
even if it's
> just educating me about some misconception I seem to
have.
>
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-dir
ectory-users
|