|
List Info
Thread: Kernel module packages, the dkms approach
|
|
| Kernel module packages, the dkms
approach |

|
2006-10-10 12:54:25 |
|
On 10/10/06, Justin Conover < justin.conover gmail.com">justin.conover gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/9/06, Matthias Saou < thias spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
thias spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net
> wrote:Matthias Saou wrote :
[...] > Feel free to let the list know what you think about this approach. Any
> bug reports, fixes, enhancements or comments regarding this package are > also very welcome. > > I'm already thinking of doing a dkms aware package of the lirc kernel > module I use on my living room computer, as well as a madwifi one, as
> tracking Rawhide updates and keeping the remote and the network working > is a waste of time!
No on-list feedback, so I don't really know what to think... 
Still, here's what I've done :
- Finished polishing the nvidia-x11-drv package, it only needs to be fixed to disable the dri and GLcore X modules on FC6, works for FC5.
- Packaged "madwifi", which contains all the tools + the dkms-enabled
kernel modules sources. I'm still having an issue with this one : After switching from a source-based install to the package, the wlan_tkip module doesn't get loaded automatically, so NetworkManager isn't able
to connect to WPA protected networks. Ugly workaround : modprobe wlan_tkip from rc.local. Any insight on this one would be most welcome.
- Packaged "dkms-tiacx", which is the first trivial dkms-enabled package
since it doesn't contain any tools, just some noarch kernel modules sources. I've only tested the build, since I don't currently have access to any acx100 hardware, but modprobing the module works.
I'll start a thread on the fedora-packaging list about a possible
naming convention for the dkms-enabled kernel modules packages (other distros seem to just be doing "dkms-<modulename>"), and hopefully also get some feedback about what people think of them. As both as a packager
and an end user, I really like them since they "just work".
Matthias
-- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages :
http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release
5.92 (FC6 Test3) - Linux kernel 2.6.18-1.2726.fc6 Load : 0.20 0.24 0.25
Looks good, I'll try and test it this week.
How about the nvidia *beta* driver 9625 in a testing repo or something?
ATI driver too?
Thank you,
ati x64 https://support.ati.com/ics/support/KBAnswer.asp?questionID=1647
ati x86
https://support.ati.com/ics/support/KBAnswer.asp?questionID=1643
nvidia beta http://www.nzone.com/object/nzone_downloads_rel70betadriver.html
|
[1]
|
|
|
about | contact Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )
|