|
|
| Latest xine-lib upgrades from extras
incompatbile with xine from Freshrpms |
  Brazil |
2007-04-14 10:15:20 |
Hi,
subject says it all: I just tried my regular package updates
with smart
and it told me it would need to remove xine and
xine-lib-moles in order
to install latest xine-lib-1.1.5-1.fc6 and
xine-lib-extras-1.1.5-1.fc6
from extras.
Matthias: any chance updated xine and xine-lib-moles hit
Freshrpms
anytime soon? (no
pressure, just 'pinging' =))
Regards,
Andre
--
Andre Oliveira da Costa
|
|
| Re: Latest xine-lib upgrades from extras
incompatbile with xine from Freshrpms |

|
2007-04-15 07:29:52 |
|
I hope this helps.
-- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ
|
| Re: Latest xine-lib upgrades from extras
incompatbile with xine from Freshrpms |

|
2007-04-15 07:29:52 |
|
I hope this helps.
-- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ
|
| Re: Latest xine-lib upgrades from extras
incompatbile with xine from Freshrpms |
  United States |
2007-04-15 08:12:15 |
Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> This one is a little bit harder to build.
>
> I needed to include 3 patches from extras, and disable
arts for building
> for 64 bits.
How did if fail exactly? build.log? If given enough
details, I'm
pretty sure I can help you sort it (arts support) out.
-- Rex
|
|
| Re: Latest xine-lib upgrades from extras
incompatbile with xine from Freshrpms |

|
2007-04-15 10:23:42 |
|
On 4/15/07, Rex Dieter < rdieter math.unl.edu">rdieter math.unl.edu> wrote:
Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> This one is a little bit harder to build. > > I needed to include 3 patches from extras, and disable arts for building > for 64 bits.
How did if fail exactly?
build.log? If given enough details, I'm pretty sure I can help you sort it (arts support) out.
-- Rex
Hi, Rex
it was trying to link against
/usr/lib/libartsc.so
and I do not have a single i386 devel package installed.
If I created a symbolic link to /usr/lib64/libartsc.so, then it would go.
I preferred just to disable arts. The package is then built and seems to be working just fine.
I think it is just a question of fine tuning xine-lib-moles spec file.
I tried now to rebuild xine-lib-extras-nonfree from livna and got the exactly the same problem.
I would appreciate If you could point me the right course.
Thanks.
-- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ
|
| Re: Latest xine-lib upgrades from extras
incompatbile with xine from Freshrpms |

|
2007-04-15 12:22:30 |
|
On 4/15/07, Rex Dieter < rdieter math.unl.edu">rdieter math.unl.edu> wrote:
Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> I tried now to rebuild xine-lib-extras-nonfree from livna and got the > exactly the same problem.
Then it's (most likely) something wrong on your box. xine-lib-extras-nonfree builds fine for x86_64 in mock.
-- Rex
Maybe. In fact,
--with-arts-prefix=%
also works for me (less bad).
And livna spec file has a
--disable-arts
in %confiigure, but this option does not exist.
[cascavel:~/redhat/SOURCES/xine-lib-1.1.5] configure --help | grep arts --disable-artstest do not try to compile and run a test ARTS program --without-arts Build without ARTS audio output
--with-arts-prefix=DIR prefix where ARTS is installed (optional)
-- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ
|
| Re: Latest xine-lib upgrades from extras
incompatbile with xine from Freshrpms |

|
2007-04-16 06:27:38 |
|
On 4/15/07, Rex Dieter < rdieter math.unl.edu">rdieter math.unl.edu> wrote:
Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> On 4/15/07, *Rex Dieter* < rdieter math.unl.edu">rdieter math.unl.edu > <mailto: rdieter math.unl.edu">rdieter math.unl.edu>> wrote:
> Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > > I tried now to rebuild xine-lib-extras-nonfree from livna and got the > > exactly the same problem. > > Then it's (most likely) something wrong on your box.
> xine-lib-extras-nonfree builds fine for x86_64 in mock.
> And livna spec file has a > > --disable-arts
Nevermind, turns out arts support is in xine-lib-extras (not xine-lib or
xine-lib-extras-nonfree). So, you probably don't want/need it elsewhere anyway.
-- Rex
Thanks, Rex.
This is the final .src.rpm:
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/xine-lib-moles-1.1.5-1.fc6.lcg.src.rpm
It includes the patches from extras and the fix for the rpaths for x86_64.
-- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ
|
| Re: Latest xine-lib upgrades from extras
incompatbile with xine from Freshrpms |
  Brazil |
2007-04-23 09:19:26 |
Hi,
it happened again :( :
Upgrading packages (2):
xine-lib-1.1.6-1.fc6 i386
xine-lib-extras-1.1.6-1.fc6 i386
Removing packages (2):
xine-0.99.4-8.fc6.rf i386
xine-lib-moles-1.1.5-1.fc6 i386
Well, since last upgrade was fixed "automagically"
after a couple of
days, I guess I'll just wait a little...
Regards,
Andre
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:15:20 -0300
Andre Costa <andre.ocosta terra.com.br> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> subject says it all: I just tried my regular package
updates with
> smart and it told me it would need to remove xine and
xine-lib-moles
> in order to install latest xine-lib-1.1.5-1.fc6 and
> xine-lib-extras-1.1.5-1.fc6 from extras.
>
> Matthias: any chance updated xine and xine-lib-moles
hit Freshrpms
> anytime soon? (no
pressure, just 'pinging' =))
>
> Regards,
>
> Andre
>
> --
> Andre Oliveira da Costa
>
--
Andre Oliveira da Costa
|
|