A few more recent ooopses on FC1

Thanks for the perl-Test-Base addition, which fixes the
dependency
problem I reported a little while ago. But clearing that up
revealed
an issue with the recent 3.6 beta rar.

Apparently rarlabs links their latest rar 3.6 beta to a
newer libc++  
than is
available on Fedora Core 1.

 >rpm -ivh rar-3.6.0-0.1.beta2.rf.i386.rpm
 >error: Failed dependencies:
 >        libstdc++.so.6 is needed by
rar-3.6.0-0.1.beta2.rf
 >        libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) is needed by  
rar-3.6.0-0.1.beta2.rf

or if you look at the binaries themselves ...

 >ldd rar unrar
 >rar:
 >        libstdc++.so.6 => not found
 >        libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x00283000)
 >        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
(0x00591000)
 >        libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x0014c000)
 >        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2
(0x00134000)
 >unrar:
 >        libstdc++.so.6 => not found
 >        libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x00283000)
 >        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
(0x00591000)
 >        libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x0014c000)
 >        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2
(0x00134000)

Fortunately unrar-3.6.2-1.rf.src.rpm still builds and
appears to work.

Also fortunately, rarlabs provides a rar_static in their
binary tarball.
I don't know enough .SPEC to provide a patch, but I guess
the
proper behavior is to install rar_static on older distros
(RH9, FC1  
etc.)


As usual, great job guys!

-dean takemori

On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Dean Takemori wrote:

> Thanks for the perl-Test-Base addition, which fixes the
dependency
> problem I reported a little while ago. But clearing
that up revealed
> an issue with the recent 3.6 beta rar.
> 
> Apparently rarlabs links their latest rar 3.6 beta to a
newer libc++ than is
> available on Fedora Core 1.
> 
> > rpm -ivh rar-3.6.0-0.1.beta2.rf.i386.rpm
> > error: Failed dependencies:
> >        libstdc++.so.6 is needed by
rar-3.6.0-0.1.beta2.rf
> >        libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) is needed by
rar-3.6.0-0.1.beta2.rf
> 
> or if you look at the binaries themselves ...
> 
> > ldd rar unrar
> > rar:
> >        libstdc++.so.6 => not found
> >        libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6
(0x00283000)
> >        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
(0x00591000)
> >        libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6
(0x0014c000)
> >        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2
(0x00134000)
> > unrar:
> >        libstdc++.so.6 => not found
> >        libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6
(0x00283000)
> >        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
(0x00591000)
> >        libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6
(0x0014c000)
> >        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2
(0x00134000)
> 
> Fortunately unrar-3.6.2-1.rf.src.rpm still builds and
appears to work.
> 
> Also fortunately, rarlabs provides a rar_static in
their binary tarball.
> I don't know enough .SPEC to provide a patch, but I
guess the
> proper behavior is to install rar_static on older
distros (RH9, FC1 etc.)
> 
> As usual, great job guys!

Are you using Fedora Legacy ? Since Fedora is out of
support, we build 
agains Fedora Legacy, and I guess you should be using it as
well for your 
own sake 

Kind regards,
--   dag wieers,  dagwieers.com,  http://dag.wieers.com/  
--
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited
power]

On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:23:47AM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
> > > rpm -ivh rar-3.6.0-0.1.beta2.rf.i386.rpm
> > > error: Failed dependencies:
> > >        libstdc++.so.6 is needed by
rar-3.6.0-0.1.beta2.rf
> > >        libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) is needed
by rar-3.6.0-0.1.beta2.rf
> 
> Are you using Fedora Legacy ? Since Fedora is out of
support, we build 
> agains Fedora Legacy, and I guess you should be using
it as well for your 
> own sake 
> 
   I'm using a few machines with RH-7.3 and FC1 with
rpmforge packages 
( thank's a lot ! ). All this servers has complete
fedora-legacy updates. 
Rar binaries had a problem with dynamically linked version
on RH-7.x
since version 3.5. I patched src.rpm myself changed to
static binary
and rebuild. This old version of original rpmforge packages
runs on Fedora 
machines correctly.
 At now, 3.6 version doesn't work on Fedora Core 1 too. I
think, would
be fine, if you put some %if phrase to specfile to use
static binaries
for dist = {rhx,fc1}. I don't have any machines with FC 2,
so I don't
know nothing about rpmforge rar packages for this
distributions.

          regards 

-- 
       Seweryn Walentynowicz
       S.Walentynowiczwalor.torun.pl

On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Seweryn Walentynowicz wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:23:47AM +0200, Dag Wieers
wrote:
> > > > rpm -ivh rar-3.6.0-0.1.beta2.rf.i386.rpm
> > > > error: Failed dependencies:
> > > >        libstdc++.so.6 is needed by
rar-3.6.0-0.1.beta2.rf
> > > >        libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) is
needed by rar-3.6.0-0.1.beta2.rf
> > 
> > Are you using Fedora Legacy ? Since Fedora is out
of support, we build 
> > agains Fedora Legacy, and I guess you should be
using it as well for your 
> > own sake 
> 
>    I'm using a few machines with RH-7.3 and FC1 with
rpmforge packages 
> ( thank's a lot ! ). All this servers has complete
fedora-legacy updates. 
> Rar binaries had a problem with dynamically linked
version on RH-7.x
> since version 3.5. I patched src.rpm myself changed to
static binary
> and rebuild. This old version of original rpmforge
packages runs on Fedora 
> machines correctly.
>  At now, 3.6 version doesn't work on Fedora Core 1
too. I think, would
> be fine, if you put some %if phrase to specfile to use
static binaries
> for dist = {rhx,fc1}. I don't have any machines with
FC 2, so I don't
> know nothing about rpmforge rar packages for this
distributions.

Ok. I understand now. Rar is not compiled, but binary-only.
I have made the fix and new packages will be available soon.

Thanks for the feedback !
--   dag wieers,  dagwieers.com,  http://dag.wieers.com/  
--
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited
power]