On Jun 9, 2006, at 12:00 AM, freshrpms-list-request freshrpms.net wrote:
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 11:28:05 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Dag Wieers <dagwieers.com>
> Subject: Re: Latest build oops
> To: "General freshrpms.net discussion list"
> <freshrpms-listfreshrpms.net>
> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606091121420.1356horsea.3ti.be>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
[snip]
> There are other cases where we make changes to SPEC
files that do not
> change the resulting binary package. Those
modifications are being
> done
> only on the SPEC file in subversion and will only
affect newer binary
> builds (either for a new distribution or for a new
release).
[snip]
>> 2) If not, there will be a report in the list
archives that anyone
>> running
>> into the same problems can find.
>
> That's fine.
This is perfectly acceptable as far as I'm concerned. A
fix eventually
gets rolled in, and there's both a report of the bug in the
list
archives and a note of the .spec fix in subversion. (Plus a
semiformal
clarification of the release criteria)
-dean takemori
|