Re: Fwd: SoC gaim-vv comments (was Re: gaim-vv support)

André Lemos wrote:
> why don't you go ask the amsn camp what they have been
doing? They 
> already have this implemented. It's time to swallow
your pride.
> 

Your suggestion supposes that amsn has designed a framework
that we
could simply drop into our code and have it work for all our
protocols.
 This is extremely unlikely given the client is specific to
MSN.  The
lack of implementation in gaim and the process we're going
through has
little to do with figuring out the protocols or codecs
required.


------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the
chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief
surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.
php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Gaim-devel mailing list
Gaim-devellists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gaim-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Kevin M Stange wrote:
> André Lemos wrote:
>> why don't you go ask the amsn camp what they have
been doing? They 
>> already have this implemented. It's time to swallow
your pride.
>>
> 
> Your suggestion supposes that amsn has designed a
framework that we
> could simply drop into our code and have it work for
all our protocols.
>  This is extremely unlikely given the client is
specific to MSN.  The
> lack of implementation in gaim and the process we're
going through has
> little to do with figuring out the protocols or codecs
required.

Not to mention aMSN is written in tcl and gaim is written in
C...

- --
Gary Kramlich <grimreaperworld.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org


iD8DBQFF+w10df4lmqisgDIRAqHFAJ9W5HPrlRddEvZFzMNHnrlTleYz+gCe
Nqdf
9Dn/61j/IY/0GmLb545Huko=
=Syft
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the
chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief
surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.
php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Gaim-devel mailing list
Gaim-devellists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gaim-devel

I meant how things were done protocol wise.

if they used v4l and how they compressed.

I'm pretty sure they'll have useful input (even if it's in
crappy tcl/tk)

Kevin M Stange wrote:
> André Lemos wrote:
>   
>> why don't you go ask the amsn camp what they have
been doing? They 
>> already have this implemented. It's time to swallow
your pride.
>>
>>     
>
> Your suggestion supposes that amsn has designed a
framework that we
> could simply drop into our code and have it work for
all our protocols.
>  This is extremely unlikely given the client is
specific to MSN.  The
> lack of implementation in gaim and the process we're
going through has
> little to do with figuring out the protocols or codecs
required.

------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the
chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief
surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.
php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Gaim-devel mailing list
Gaim-devellists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gaim-devel