On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 21:04 +0200, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> I can't be bothered to open up a bug report, but I've
attached a trivial
> patch.
...
> I think the logic in there still looks suspect though:
AFAICT there may
> be other scenarios than the one I accidentally tried
where 'unpack' may
> remain True while unpack_cmd does not get set to
anything meaningful.
> With my patch this will result in the new error message
as well -- I'm
> not sure how appropriate that is.
>
> Anyway, the patch certainly certainly shouldn't cause
any regressions.
> The new message only triggers when an undefined
variable would be
> accessed anyway.
I'll have to test it. It sure would be nice if there were
a bug report
for this so that I didn't lose this email in all of my
pre-release
hustle. Maybe I'll happen to remember this email when I
get to doing
catalyst testing again. Who knows...
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux
|