On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 10:49 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 06-02-2007 10:40:33 +0100, Johan Hattne wrote:
> > >Thinking about a completely hypothetical
MinGW+prefix-portage, this
> > >becomes even more apparent. (/me runs to hide,
suggesting this. )
> >
> > I think the issue has been touched on before
(Haubi?). Being able to
> > deal with case insensitive file systems would open
up a big market for
> > prefix-portage.
>
> You make it sound like prefix is the one to decide.
But it's mainly not
> up to prefix, as it's up to package maintainers. One
example of a big
> problem was the W3C (yes, that standards commitee
thing) tool called 'W',
> which clashes with 'w', which is available on almost
any system.
> Prefix currently only has this specific problem of two
licences that are
> the same name when you look at it case INsensitively.
One of the two
> is currently just removed because we don't have the
respective package
> in the tree yet.
Exactly, this is up to package maintainers:
We currently have our "toolsbox" running on
i586-interix with
case-insensitive filesystem, multilib-like building native
win32
binaries using wgcc[1], and encountered only trivial
problems based on
case-sensitivity, to be fixed by package maintainers.
[1] http://s
ourceforge.net/projects/interix-wgcc
So - Johan - the "big market" is already open!
/haubi/
--
gentoo-alt gentoo.org mailing list
|