Herd split? hac-cluster and hpc-cluster

We might benefit from splitting the clustering packages into
two 
separate groups for high-availability and high-performance
computing. 
This will help to keep the bugs a bit cleaner so each group
of folks 
will have a clearer idea of what they need to do.

Does anyone else have thoughts on this?

Thanks,
Donnie
-- 
gentoo-clustergentoo.org mailing list

Donnie Berkholz schrieb:
> We might benefit from splitting the clustering packages
into two 
> separate groups for high-availability and
high-performance computing. 
> This will help to keep the bugs a bit cleaner so each
group of folks 
> will have a clearer idea of what they need to do.
> 
> Does anyone else have thoughts on this?
i vote yes.


Alex
-- 
gentoo-clustergentoo.org mailing list

Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> We might benefit from splitting the clustering packages
into two
> separate groups for high-availability and
high-performance computing.
> This will help to keep the bugs a bit cleaner so each
group of folks
> will have a clearer idea of what they need to do.
> 
> Does anyone else have thoughts on this?
> 

It sounds like a good idea.  Are there enough developers who
would want to go
with either herd to make it viable?

-- 
Andrew Fant    | And when the night is cloudy    | This
space to let
Molecular Geek | There is still a light         
|----------------------
fantpobox.com | That shines on me               |
Disclaimer:  I don't
Boston, MA     | Shine until tomorrow, Let it be | even
speak for myself

-- 
gentoo-clustergentoo.org mailing list

Andrew D. Fant wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> We might benefit from splitting the clustering
packages into two
>> separate groups for high-availability and
high-performance computing.
>> This will help to keep the bugs a bit cleaner so
each group of folks
>> will have a clearer idea of what they need to do.
>>
>> Does anyone else have thoughts on this?
>>
> 
> It sounds like a good idea.  Are there enough
developers who would want to go
> with either herd to make it viable?

Here's the cluster alias:

azarah
ct
george
dberkholz
pyrania
voxus
iggy
xmerlin
markusle
ribosome

Of those, I haven't seen azarah, ct, george, pyrania or iggy
do anything 
lately.

ha: xmerlin
hpc: dberkholz, voxus, xmerlin, markusle, ribosome
tantive also has metadata for much of the openmosix stuff.

This pretty clearly shows that we could use extra help for
HA packages.

Thanks,
Donnie
-- 
gentoo-clustergentoo.org mailing list

On Dec 11, 2006, at 9:11 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:

> Does anyone else have thoughts on this?

I think, hac-cluster and hpc-cluster sound strange, since c
in hpc  
and hac already stands for cluster.

Philipp
-- 
gentoo-clustergentoo.org mailing list

Philipp Riegger wrote:
> 
> On Dec 11, 2006, at 9:11 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> 
>> Does anyone else have thoughts on this?
> 
> I think, hac-cluster and hpc-cluster sound strange,
since c in hpc and 
> hac already stands for cluster.

or computing...
-- 
gentoo-clustergentoo.org mailing list

I can give a hand at HAC. I've been putting into production
a SLES10
HA-Cluster with ocfs2 and I've some free time to help out.

On 12/11/06, Donnie Berkholz <dberkholzgentoo.org> wrote:
> Andrew D. Fant wrote:
> > Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> >> We might benefit from splitting the clustering
packages into two
> >> separate groups for high-availability and
high-performance computing.
> >> This will help to keep the bugs a bit cleaner
so each group of folks
> >> will have a clearer idea of what they need to
do.
> >>
> >> Does anyone else have thoughts on this?
> >>
> >
> > It sounds like a good idea.  Are there enough
developers who would want to go
> > with either herd to make it viable?
>
> Here's the cluster alias:
>
> azarah
> ct
> george
> dberkholz
> pyrania
> voxus
> iggy
> xmerlin
> markusle
> ribosome
>
> Of those, I haven't seen azarah, ct, george, pyrania or
iggy do anything
> lately.
>
> ha: xmerlin
> hpc: dberkholz, voxus, xmerlin, markusle, ribosome
> tantive also has metadata for much of the openmosix
stuff.
>
> This pretty clearly shows that we could use extra help
for HA packages.
>
> Thanks,
> Donnie
> --
> gentoo-clustergentoo.org mailing list
>
>
-- 
gentoo-clustergentoo.org mailing list

Le lundi 11 décembre 2006 02:11, Donnie Berkholz a
écrit :
> We might benefit from splitting the clustering packages
into two 
> separate groups for high-availability and
high-performance computing. 
> This will help to keep the bugs a bit cleaner so each
group of folks 
> will have a clearer idea of what they need to do.
> 
> Does anyone else have thoughts on this?
Yes, definately...

> Thanks,
> Donnie

-- 
Eric Thibodeau
Neural Bucket Solutions Inc.

-- 
gentoo-clustergentoo.org mailing list

I think it's a fairly good idea,

-- 
E-mail: hanni.aligmail.com
Mobile: 07985580147
Website: <a href="http://ainkaboot.co.uk">http://ainkaboot
.co.uk</a>
-- 
gentoo-clustergentoo.org mailing list