-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:29:47 -0500
> Grant Goodyear <g2boojum gentoo.org> wrote:
>> (As an aside, I didn't realize that Roy's e-mail
was supposed to
>> be a proctor directive.)
>
> He changed the subject and signed "on behalf of
gentoo-proctors".
>
>> Is there a way to fix the current system, or should
it be chucked
>> entirely, as has been suggested?
>
> The problem is not so much the system as a small number
of the
> proctors. Perhaps it should be restaffed with people
who aren't so used
> to wielding god-like powers on the forums, where anyone
who dares say
> anything that disagrees with a small clique's
collective views can
> be banned permanently with no accountability.
>
Or... perhaps when asked not to respond to a thread for 24
hours, you
could keep your fucking trap shut?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGZtZx1c+EtXTHkJcRAosHAJ42XbbNLSEaOVeLtAcEvTFMrmhAvQCg
gR5l
NKfMVHNa0HuInct529dbI0s=
=s4+3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev gentoo.org mailing list
|