Matthias Langer <mlangc gmx.at> posted
1181592652.5808.3.camel sputnik886.lnet, excerpted below, on Mon,
11 Jun
2007 22:10:52 +0200:
> On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 19:01 +0200, Alexander Gabert
wrote:
[snipped]
> if you came to the conclusion, that ciaranm is some
kind of ultra-nasty
> troll, then why is it so hard for you to just ignore
him?
Well, it would appear that the message you were replying to
was the
actual troll. It itself called itself troll food, so the
author
recognized/admitted part of that, but go back and read it if
necessary.
He could ignore, but it was a deliberate troll, so he chose
not to. (And
me, I didn't respond directly, but here I am responding in
the tail, so
yeah, I'm rewarding the troll as well.)
You can't ignore what might or might not be a troll if you
are using it
as a deliberate excuse to do your own trolling, which is
what I see your
parent post (my grandparent) as being. Elements of truth,
certainly,
that's what makes a good troll, but troll it is.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."
Richard Stallman
--
gentoo-dev gentoo.org mailing list
|