kernel version and binutils issues

On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 02:17:17PM +0100, Davide Cittaro
wrote:
> Hi again, since 2.4 has been deprecated, which is the
latest 2.6.x kernel 
> with full support for SMP on alpha (titan)? 

SMP alpha problems were fixed long ago (~2006) so latest
stable should work
just fine.

> Also, is written that 
> gentoo-sources or vanilla-sources should work well the
same, so I wonder 
> which one I should try first.

Whatever you prefer. We recommend gentoo-sources which
recieve full
support from the Gentoo Kernel Team.

>
> Also, while I was trying the stage 1 installation I've
went through an 
> error emerging binutils:

Stage 1 and Stage 2 installations stop recieving support
quite a long
time ago, so please, go for a stage3 one.

>
>
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.18-r1/work/binutils-2.
18/bfd/trad-core.c: 
> In function 'trad_unix_core_file_p':
>
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.18-r1/work/binutils-2.
18/bfd/trad-core.c:122: 
> error: 'PAGE_SIZE' undeclared (first use in this
function)
>
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.18-r1/work/binutils-2.
18/bfd/trad-core.c:122: 
> error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only
once
>
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.18-r1/work/binutils-2.
18/bfd/trad-core.c:122: 
> error: for each function it appears in.)
> make[4]: *** [trad-core.lo] Error 1
>

This is a known problem. Please try a stage3 clean install
and if it
fails, create a bug report and I will check it.

-- 
Jose Luis Rivero <yoswinkgentoo.org>
Gentoo/Doc Gentoo/Alpha

-- 
gentoo-alphalists.gentoo.org mailing list

On Jan 21, 2008, at 5:54 PM, Jose Luis Rivero wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 02:17:17PM +0100, Davide
Cittaro wrote:
>> Hi again, since 2.4 has been deprecated, which is
the latest 2.6.x  
>> kernel
>> with full support for SMP on alpha (titan)?
>
> SMP alpha problems were fixed long ago (~2006) so
latest stable  
> should work
> just fine.
>

I'm glad to read this... I hope that tomorrow kernel
building will go  
fine 

>>
>> Also, while I was trying the stage 1 installation
I've went through  
>> an
>> error emerging binutils:
>
> Stage 1 and Stage 2 installations stop recieving
support quite a long
> time ago, so please, go for a stage3 one.
>

Ouch! Is that the reason why gentoo handbook jumps from
unpacking  
stage to kernel configuration? Why stage1 and stage2
tarballs are  
still on mirror?

>>
>>
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.18-r1/work/binutils-2.
18/bfd/ 
>> trad-core.c:
>> In function 'trad_unix_core_file_p':
>>
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.18-r1/work/binutils-2.
18/bfd/ 
>> trad-core.c:122:
>> error: 'PAGE_SIZE' undeclared (first use in this
function)
>>
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.18-r1/work/binutils-2.
18/bfd/ 
>> trad-core.c:122:
>> error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only
once
>>
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.18-r1/work/binutils-2.
18/bfd/ 
>> trad-core.c:122:
>> error: for each function it appears in.)
>> make[4]: *** [trad-core.lo] Error 1
>>
>
> This is a known problem. Please try a stage3 clean
install and if it
> fails, create a bug report and I will check it.
>

Great. I have to do this, even because I've just discovered
that  
stage2 has been blocked on coreutils building...

d

Davide Cittaro
davide.cittaroifom-ieo-campus.it

--
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Teach a man to
phish, and if  
he gets caught he'll be eating that fish through a straw



-- 
gentoo-alphalists.gentoo.org mailing list

On Jan 21, 2008, at 5:54 PM, Jose Luis Rivero wrote:

> Whatever you prefer. We recommend gentoo-sources which
recieve full
> support from the Gentoo Kernel Team.


Here we are:

   CC      arch/alpha/kernel/core_titan.o
   CC      arch/alpha/kernel/sys_titan.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
arch/alpha/kernel/sys_titan.c: In function
‘titan_late_init’:
arch/alpha/kernel/sys_titan.c:281: warning: ignoring return
value of  
‘request_irq’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
arch/alpha/kernel/sys_titan.c:283: warning: ignoring return
value of  
‘request_irq’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
arch/alpha/kernel/sys_titan.c:285: warning: ignoring return
value of  
‘request_irq’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
arch/alpha/kernel/sys_titan.c:287: warning: ignoring return
value of  
‘request_irq’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
arch/alpha/kernel/sys_titan.c:289: warning: ignoring return
value of  
‘request_irq’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
arch/alpha/kernel/sys_titan.c: In function
‘privateer_init_pci’:
arch/alpha/kernel/sys_titan.c:348: warning: ignoring return
value of  
‘request_irq’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
arch/alpha/kernel/sys_titan.c:350: warning: ignoring return
value of  
‘request_irq’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
make[1]: *** [arch/alpha/kernel/sys_titan.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/alpha/kernel] Error 2

I'm not sure if removing -Werror from compilation flags
would be a  
good idea... any hint (this is gentoo-sources-2.6.22-r10)

d


Davide Cittaro
davide.cittaroifom-ieo-campus.it

--
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Teach a man to
phish, and if  
he gets caught he'll be eating that fish through a straw



--
gentoo-alphalists.gentoo.org mailing list