On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 16:06 -0500, Charles Duffy wrote:
> Wendall Cada wrote:
> > I very much agree with his assessment here. This
is what I do for binary
> > distribution to desktop systems. It is very
effective. I have played
> > with Catalyst quite a bit, but agree that
catalyst-2 is much more well
> > suited for this.
>
> I'm sorry; which "this" are you referring to?
I'm a little unclear on
> whether what you're indicating that you use is Ramon's
suggestion (of
> using catalyst-2) or our senior sysadmin's suggestion
(of using emerge,
> set to output binary packages and target a chroot).
I use (of using emerge, set to output binary packages and
target a
chroot) right now, as Ramon's senior sysadmin recommends.
But am looking
into using catalyst-2 in the future.
Wendall
>
> Thank you!
>
--
Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ men just upload their
important stuff
on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it ;)
-- Linus Torvalds
|
